Inequality and transaction costs in a community-based water supply in rural area adjacent to national park

Ambar Istiyani, Mohamad Shohibuddin


National parks can be sensitive state-property areas since the surrounding communities generally need the parks' resources for their livelihood. This paper focuses on inequality and transaction costs in PAMSIMAS (Community-Based Water Supply and Sanitation), a water sector program in Indonesia’s rural and peri-urban areas. The method used is a case study of PAMSIMAS in Tajuk, a village adjacent to Mount Merbabu National Park in Semarang Regency, Central Java. The data were gathered from documentary studies, in-depth interviews, and observations, and were analyzed using transaction cost economics and institutional analysis. This study found that the rules of PAMSIMAS, especially water pricing mechanisms, enhanced water availability but could not diminish the uncertainty of water access and transaction costs born by water users. Inequalities of endowment, power, and information among the hamlets affected how PAMSIMAS was run. Mobilization of water resources is related to property rights, which should be well-defined. Still, there was an overlapping property institution of Mount Merbabu National Park forest and its water resources; thus, the water user groups had to bear different transaction costs. The study provides suggestions for providing broader 'rules of the game' in rural water management, recognizing local conditions and prospects, acknowledging community rights to resources, and developing inclusive community participation.

JEL Classification D23; P48; Q15


collective action; inequality; national park; transaction cost; water supply

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 4 times
PDF view : 5 times

Full Text:



Arifin, B. (2006). Transaction cost analysis of upstream-downstream relations in watershed services: Lessons from community-based forestry management in Sumatra, Indonesia. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 45(4), 361-375 Retrieved from

Asminar, A. (2019). Partisipasi dan swadaya masyarakat dalam rangka menyukseskan Pamsimas III di Kabupaten Bungo, Provinsi Jambi. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 3(1), 35.

Baland, J. M., & Platteau, J.-P. (2018). Collective action on the commons: In Inequality, Cooperation, and Environmental Sustainability. Princeton University Press (pp. 10–35).

Bardhan, P., Ghatak, M., & Karaivanov, A. (2018). Inequality and Collective Action. In Inequality, Cooperation, and Environmental Sustainability. Princeton University Press (pp. 36–59).

Benra, F., & Nahuelhual, L. (2019). A trilogy of inequalities: Land ownership, forest cover and ecosystem services distribution. Land Use Policy, 82, 247–257.

Chaerunissa, C. (2014). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam program penyediaan air minum dan sanitasi berbasis masyarakat (Pamsimas) Di Kabupaten Brebes. Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 5(2), 99-113.

Chen, Z., Wang, H., & Qi, X. (2013). Pricing and water resource allocation scheme for the south-to-north water diversion project in China. Water Resources Management, 27(5), 1457–1472.

Coggan, A., Buitelaar, E., Whitten, S., & Bennett, J. (2013). Factors that influence transaction costs in development offsets: Who bears what and why? Ecological Economics, 88, 222–231.

Craig, R. K. (2012). Defining riparian rights as “property” through takings litigation: Is there a property right to environmental quality? Environmental Law, 42(1), 115-155. Retrieved from

Curry, N. (2009). National parks. In International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 229–235).

De Pourcq, K., Thomas, E., Arts, B., Vranckx, A., Léon-Sicard, T., & Van Damme, P. (2017). Understanding and resolving conflict between local communities and conservation authorities in Colombia. World Development, 93, 125–135.

Deng, X., Song, X., & Xu, Z. (2018). Transaction costs, modes, and scales from agricultural to industrialwater rights trading in an Inland River Basin, Northwest China. Water (Switzerland), 10(11).

Dunggio, I., & Gunawan, H. (2009). An overview on the history of national park management policy in Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Kebijakan Kehutanan, 6(1), 43–56. Retrieved from

Everard, M., & Dupont, N. A. (2018). Property rights. In The Wetland Book: I: Structure and Function, Management, and Methods (pp. 981–986).

Fitriyani, N., & Rahdriawan, M. (2015). Evaluasi pemanfaatan air bersih Program Pamsimas Di Kecamatan Tembalang. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota, 3(2), 80.

García, M. M., & Bodin, Ö. (2019). Participation in multiple decision making water governance forums in Brazil enhances actors’ perceived level of influence. Policy Studies Journal, 47(1), 27–51.

Gunawan, H., Bismark, M., & Krisnawati, H. (2013). Kajian sosial ekonomi masyarakat sekitar sebagai dasar penetapan tipe penyangga Taman Nasional Gunung Merbabu, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Hutan Dan Konservasi Alam, 2013(2), 103–119.

Hardin, R. (2015). Collective action. In Collective Action. RFF Press. 268p.

Istiyani, A. (2014). Dinamika pengelolaan sumber daya air di era otonomi daerah studi kasus di Desa Tajuk, Kec. Getasan , Kab. Semarang. Kritis, 23(2), 109–130. 10.24246/kritis.v23i2p109-130

Kurian, M., & Dietz, T. (2013). Leadership on the commons: wealth distribution, co-provision and service delivery. Journal of Development Studies, 49(11), 1532–1547.

Laurenceau, M., Destandau, F., & Rozan, A. (2009). A transaction cost approach to assess the Water Framework Directive implementation. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 125, 567–578.

Li, T. M. (2016). Governing rural Indonesia: Convergence on the project system. Critical Policy Studies, 10(1), 79–94.

Lightfoot, G., & Wisniewski, T. P. (2014). Information asymmetry and power in a surveillance society. Information and Organization, 24(4), 214–235.

Lunstrum, E. (2013). Articulated sovereignty: Extending Mozambican state power through the Great Limpopo Transfrontier Park1. Political Geography, 36, 1–11.

Lunstrum, E. (2014). Green militarization: Anti-poaching efforts and the spatial contours of Kruger National Park. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(4), 816–832.

McCann, L. (2013). Transaction costs and environmental policy design. Ecological Economics, 88, 253–262.

Meinzen-Dick, R. (2014). Property rights and sustainable irrigation: A developing country perspective. Agricultural Water Management, 145, 23–31.

Meinzen-Dick, R., Raju, K. V., & Gulati, A. (2002). What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. World Development, 30(4), 649–666.

Mukherjee, A. (2009). Conflict and coexistence in a National Park. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(23), 52–59. Retrieved from

Narasimhan, S. (2016). Water Pricing: Potential and problems. International Journal of Agricultural Economics and Management, 6(1), 2277–3215. Retrieved from ijaem16/ijaemv6n1_02.pdf

Njiraini, G. W., Thiam, D. R., & Coggan, A. (2017). The analysis of transaction costs in water policy implementation in South Africa: Trends, determinants and economic implications. Water Economics and Policy, 3(1). 1650020-1-30.

North, D. C. (2016). Institutions and economic theory. The American Economist, 61(1), 72–76.

Ntuli, H., & Muchapondwa, E. (2017). Effects of wildlife resources on community welfare in Southern Africa. In Ecological Economics (Vol. 131, pp. 572–583).

Ostrom, E. (2010). Institutional Analysis and Development: Elements of the framework in historical perspective. Historical Developments and Theoretical Approaches in Sociology, II, 261–288. Retrieved from

Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing The Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. In Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. books?id=hHGgCgAAQBAJ

Pratama, A. B., & Isnanik, A. T. (2018). Evaluasi berjalan program penyediaan air minum dan sanitasi berbasis masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Dan Praktek Administrasi, 15(2), 148–162.

Rejekiningrum, P., & Kartiwa, B. (2018). Institutional development of irrigation management based on the local wisdom in Indonesia. Journal of Socioeconomics and Development, 1(1), 52-62.

Saam, N. J. (2007). Asymmetry in information versus asymmetry in power: Implicit assumptions of agency theory? Journal of Socio-Economics, 36(6), 825–840.

Sandlos, J. (2007). Federal spaces, local conflicts: national parks and the exclusionary politics of the conservation movement in Ontario, 1900-1935. Journal of the Canadian Historical Association, 16(1), 293–318.

Schotch, P. K. (2018). Hyperdeontic logic: An overview. In Social Rules: Origin; Character; Logic; Change (pp. 21–34). Taylor and Francis.

Shohibuddin, M. (2016). Peluang dan tantangan Undang-undang Desa dalam upaya demokratisasi tata kelola sumber daya alam desa: Perspektif agraria kritis. Masyarakat: Jurnal Sosiologi, 21(1), 1-33.

Shohibuddin, M., Cahyono, E., & Bahri, A. D. (2017). Undang-Undang Desa dan isu sumberdaya alam: Peluang akses atau ancaman eksklusi? Wacana, 19(36), 29–81. Retrieved from https://insistpress. com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Wacana-36-Kajian-2-Shohibuddin-Cahyono-Bahri.pdf

Suroso, S. (2018). Implementasi kebijakan pamsimas dalam penyediaan air bersih bagi masyarakatdi Kabupaten Pati. Jurnal Litbang: Media Informasi Penelitian, Pengembangan dan Iptek, 12(1), 3–13.

The World Bank. (2014). PAMSIMAS : Responding to the Water and Sanitation Challenges in Rural Indonesia. 59.World Bank Retrieved from

Tumusiime, D. M., & Sjaastad, E. (2014). Conservation and development: Justice, inequality, and attitudes around Bwindi Impenetrable National Park. Journal of Development Studies, 50(2), 204–225.

Vedeld, P., Jumane, A., Wapalila, G., & Songorwa, A. (2012). Protected areas, poverty and conflicts. A livelihood case study of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, 21, 20–31.

Williamson, O. E. (2015). Transaction costs and property rights. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (pp. 528–532).

Williamson, O. E. (2019). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. In Corporate Governance: Values, Ethics and Leadership (pp. 133–162).

Womble, P., & Hanemann, W. M. (2020). Legal change and water market transaction costs in Colorado. Water Resources Research, 56(4).

Wray, E. (2019). Indonesia: Expanding access to clean water for the rural poor. World Bank. Retrieved from 2019/07/29/indonesia-expanding-access-to-clean-water-for-the-rural-poor

Zhang, L. H., Jia, S. F., Leung, C. K., & Guo, L. P. (2013). An analysis on the transaction costs of water markets under DPA and UPA auctions. Water Resources Management, 27(2), 475–484.


  • There are currently no refbacks.