Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Merek: Suatu Kajian Komparatif Antara Jepang Dan Indonesia

Authors

  • Nopiana Nopiana Universitas Internasional Batam
  • Hari Sutra Disemadi Universitas Internasional Batam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v4i2.2283

Keywords:

Comparison, Trademark Rights, Indonesia, Japan

Abstract

Industrial revolution 4.0 causes everyone to compete to produce work. One of the things that play an important role in this industry is a brand. The term brand is familiar in society, every day we use many products with various brands. This is where the presence of a brand is needed to differentiate the products that have been produced. Brands also make it easy for consumers to identify the products they want. With the increasing number of products on the market today, it is necessary to regulate the brand. Everyone is indeed free to work, but that freedom is also often violated. Therefore, as a part of intellectual property, the brand must get protection. So, this research aims to compare the protection of brands between Japan and Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a comparative law approach. Indonesia already has a legal instrument that regulates trademark protection, namely Law no. 20 of 2016. The same is done by Japan. They have also provided protection to their citizens about trademark rights. This is stipulated in the Japan Trademark Act.

References

Abdurahman, Humaedi. (2020). “Asas Fisrt To File Principal Dalam Kasus Hak Merek Nama Terkenal Bensu.†Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum), 428-443.

Adiputra, I Gede Mahendra Juliana, Ida Ayu Putu Widiati, and Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti. (2020). “Penyelesaian Perkara Pelanggaran Hak atas Merek.†Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 1.2: 67-71.

Amboro, F. Yudhi Priyo. (2019). “Problematika Pendaftaran Merek Untuk Usaha Mikro, Kecil dan Menengah di Kota Batam.†Journal of Judicial Review 21.1:1-14.

Anindyajati, Titis, Irfan Nur Rachman, and Anak Agung Dian Onita. (2016). “Konstitusionalitas Norma Sanksi Pidana Sebagai Ultimum Remedium Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undanganâ€. Jurnal Konstitusi 12.4: 872-892.

Benuf, Kornelius, and Muhamad Azhar. (2020). “Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer.†Gema Keadilan 7.1: 20-33.

Dewi, Chandra Gita. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelanggaran Merek. Deepublish.

Diantha, I Made Pasek. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Prenada Media.

Disemadi, Hari Sutra, and Cindy Kang. (2021). “Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Kreatif di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0.†Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 7.1: 54-71.

Disemadi, Hari Sutra, and Wiranto Mustamin. (2020). “Pembajakan Merek Dalam Tatanan Hukum Kekayaan Intelektual Di Indonesia.†Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 6.1: 83-94.

Effendi, Tonny Dian. (2021). Diplomasi Publik Jepang: perkembangan dan tantangan. Ghalia Indonesia.

Faradz, Haedah. (2008). “Perlindungan Hak Atas Merekâ€. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 8.1: 38-42.

Firmansyah, Hery. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek: Panduan Memahami Dasar Hukum Penggunaan dan Perlindungan Merek. Media Pressindo.

Hakim, Miftahur Rahman, and Nur Kholidah. (2020). “Hak Merek Sebagai Jaminan Gadai Untuk Permodalan Umkm Industri Kreatif Kerajinan Batikâ€. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum 18.2.

Karina, Rahmadia Maudy Putri, and Rinitami Njatrijani. (2019). “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang Ikea Atas Penghapusan Merek Dagangâ€, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 1.2: 194-212.

Marlyna, Henny, and Agus Sardjono. (2019). “Does the Trademark Protection Regulation Protect Consumers against Counterfeit Products? Analyzing the Theories of Trademark and Indonesian Trademark Law.†Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities 27.2.

Moeljatno. (2002). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ono, Shoen. (1999). Overview of Japanese Trademark Law. Yuhikatu, Tokio.

Pratama, Toebagus Galang Windi. (2018). “Perbandingan Sistem Pendaftaran Merek Negara Indonesia Dengan Zimbabweâ€. Jurnal Meta-Yuridis 1.1.

Putong, Iskandar, and Nuring Dyah Andjaswati. (2010). “Pengantar Ekonomi Makroâ€. Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media.

Putra, Fajar Nurcahya Dwi. (2014). “Perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang hak atas merek terhadap perbuatan pelanggaran merek.†Mimbar Keadilan: 97-108.

Putra, Renggi Ardya. (2018). “Legal Possibility to Regulate Defensive Mark as Well-Known Mark Protection in Indonesia.†JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property 1.1: 1-12.

Rosser, AQ. (1999). “The Political Economy of Institutional Reform in Indonesiaâ€. Law, Capitalism and Power in Asia: The Rule of Law and Legal Institutions: 95-117.

Samosir, Prisca Oktaviani, and Aida Mustafa. (2020). “Legal Protection Implications on Trademark in Indonesia by Comparing the First to Use and First to File Principles.†International Conference on Law Reform (INCLAR 2019). Atlantis Press, :143-146.

Sembiring, Jimmy Joses. (2011). Cara Menyelesaikan Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan. Visimedia.

Setiawan, R. (1999). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Bardin.

Shaleh, Ali Ismail, and Shabirah Trisnabilah. (2020). “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Persamaan Merek Untuk Barang Atau Jasa Yang Sejenis: Studi Merek Bossini.†Journal of Judicial Review 22.2: 291-300.

Sugiarti, Yayuk. (2016). “Perlindungan Merek Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Ditinjau dari Undang-undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 Tentang Merek.†Jendela Hukum 3.1: 32-41.

Susanto, Yoghi Arief. (2020). “Jangka Waktu Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Merek Dalam Tinjauan Maslahah Mursalah.†Aktualita (Jurnal Hukum): 416-427.

Syarief, Elza, et al. (2021). “Potensi Terjadinya Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat pada Penggunaan Aplikasi Perdagangan Elektronik di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0.†Jurnal Supremasi: 105-114.

Syarifuddin, Muhammad Setya Ady. (2019). “Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Perjanjian Lisensi Merek.†Simbur Cahaya 26.1: 27-41.

Yanto, Oksidelfa. (2012). “Tinjauan Yuridis UU No. 15 Tahun 2001 Tentang Merek: Sisi Lain Kelemahan Sistem First to File Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Atas Merek Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (HaKI).†ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 3.1: 23-45., hlm. 26.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-01

How to Cite

Nopiana, N., & Disemadi, H. S. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Merek: Suatu Kajian Komparatif Antara Jepang Dan Indonesia. Widya Yuridika, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v4i2.2283

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum

Section

Articles

License

AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions

  • Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
  • Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal

========================================
Editor-in-Chief

Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.