Perbuatan Makar di Indonesia: Kebijakan Hukum & Ketentuan Penyidikan

Authors

  • Winson Winson Universitas Internasional Batam
  • Abdurakhman Alhakim Universitas Internasional Batam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i2.3556

Keywords:

Criminal Law Policy, Makar, Investigation

Abstract

Indonesia is a state of law, as mandated in the Indonesian constitution. And also Indonesia is a democratic country that upholds the sovereignty of the people, this is certainly inseparable from the problems that then arise by the people and the sovereign government, namely an act which is then carried out by a person or group of people to overthrow the sovereign government or commonly known as a crime. treason. In Indonesia, the crime of treason is something that often happens considering that Indonesia is a democratic country. So the purpose of this research is to find out the provisions of the investigation of the perpetrators of the crime of treason in Indonesia and the policy of criminal law against the perpetrators of the crime of treason in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical research method. And it is known that the crime of treason in Indonesia has been explained in the Criminal Code, which in article 104 of the Criminal Code concerning treason, in this case, has an explanation related to the objective and subjective elements of an act of treason so that some provisions on the applicable criminal law policy, in this case, This can be used to adjust to the act of treason committed by the perpetrator.

References

Alam, S. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Konsep Makar dalam Perspektif Hukum Tata Negara Islam. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 26(2), 310-324.

Anshari. (2018). Delik Terhadap Keamanan Negara (Makar) di Indoensia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 49(3).

Aripkah, N., Soponyono, E., & Putra, A. W. (2020). People’s Power Policy in Legal Construction in Treason Criminal Law as Indonesian Penal Code Reform. Unram Law Review, 4(2), 84-97.

Bawuno, G. A. (2022). Penindakan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Makar Sebagaimana Dirumuskan Dalam Pasal 104 Kuhp. Lex Crimen, 11(1).

Chazawi, A. (2002). Kejahatan Terhadap Keamanan dan Keselamatan Negara, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Fajrin, Y. A., Triwijaya, A. F., Prastyo, F. S., & Naufal, M. (2021). Reformulasi Delik Makar Dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Nasional Tahun 2019 (Sebuah Telaah Leksikal Terhadap Terminologi Aanslag). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(1), 74-94.

Ganesh, J., Jaya, N. S. P., & Pujiyono, P. (2019). Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Makar Di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 8(3), 2076-2095.

Hufron. (2014). Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Tindak Pidana Makar. Jurnal Hukum, 6(3).

Ilham, A. N. (2022). Peran Ptun Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Masyarakat Atas Tindakan Hukum Pemerintah Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 28(9), 4507-4522.

Mulia, K. D. A., AFRIZAL, M. S., & PUTERA, L. D. H. (2020). Pertangungjawaban Pidana Anggota Organisasi Papua Merdeka (OPM) Sebagai Pelaku Makar. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 4(2).

Ningsih, B. C. S. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Makar Pada Gerakan People Power Tanggal 17 April 2019. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 26(7), 869-881.

Permana, F. H., Soponyono, E., & Sularto, R. B. (2017). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Makar Di Indonesia. Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(4), 1-11.

Pratama, R.P.P. (2018). Peran Kepolisian Dalam Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Makar. Jurnal Hukum, 3(3).

Pungus, D. I. E. (2022). Tindak Pidana Anggota Tni Dalam Kontak Senjata Yang Mengakibatkan Kehilangan Nyawa Anggota Organisasi Papua Merdeka Selaku Organisasi Pemberontak (Alasan Penghapusan Pidana Pasal 338 KUHP). LEX PRIVATUM, 9(13).

Setyowati, S. (2022). Problematika Persidangan Dalam Jaringan (Daring) Perkara Pidana Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Pamulang Law Review, 4(2), 221-230.

Siahaan, H. (2018). Tindak Pidana Terhadap Keamanan Negara Dalam Perspektif Delik Politik Di Indonesia. Solusi, 16(1), 31-36.

Siswanto, E., & Islamy, A. (2022). Meninjau Ulang Polemik Formalisasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia Perspektif Demokrasi Pancasila: Analisis SWOT. MIYAH: Jurnal Studi Islam, 18(1), 19-40.

Soenartho, G. A. Kebijakan Kriminal Dalam Menanggulangi Upaya Makar Yang Dilakukan Oleh Organisasi Papua Merdeka (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri NOMOR 1304/2019/PID. B. 2019/PN JKT PST). Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(2), 1820-1844.

Sudarto. (1986). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Alumni.

Sulaeman, E. (2019). Crime of Makar and Its Enforcement in Post-Reform Indonesia. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 1(1), 4-9.

Sunarto D. M. (2009). Rekonstruksi Hukum Pidana Era Transformasi dan Globalisasi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Secara Integratif, Bandar Lampung: Universitas Lampung.

Sundari, R. (2022). Studi Pemetaan Tipologi Konflik Di Kawasan Timur Tengah. Jurnal Niara, 14(3), 252-258.

Trahjurendra, A. A. (2014). Politik Hukum Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Makar Di Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Brawijaya University).

Wiratraman, H. P. (2021). Rasisme dan Penerapan Pasal Makar terhadap Kebebasan Ekspresi Politik Papua. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 4(1), 49-80.

Zubaedah, P. A., & Anwar, S. (2020). Analisis Al-Baghyu Dalam Fiqih Jinayah Terhadap Makna Makar Dalam Pasal 107 KUHP. Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 5(1), 117-127.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-01

How to Cite

Winson, W., & Alhakim, A. (2022). Perbuatan Makar di Indonesia: Kebijakan Hukum & Ketentuan Penyidikan. Widya Yuridika, 5(2), 319 – 330. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i2.3556

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum

Section

Articles

License

AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions

  • Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
  • Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal

========================================
Editor-in-Chief

Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.