Obstacle Factors For Legal Protection Of Nike Brand Holders
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i1.3870Keywords:
Imitation, Legal Protection, Trademark.Abstract
The existence of the Ministry of Law and Human Rights as an institution in the registration of trademarks and the Department of Industry and Trade as a supervisory agency in the circulation of goods in Indonesia and needs to be optimized related to the functions of supervision, guidance and enforcement. This is done because the functions of supervision, guidance and prosecution are not optimal for traders who sell counterfeit goods. This study aims to determine the factors that hinder the implementation of legal protection for Nike trademark holders on counterfeit shoes in the Klithikan Pakuncen market in Yogyakarta. This research was normative-empirical research using primary data and secondary data. The results of the study show that there are three inhibiting factors for the implementation of legal protection, namely the Law Factor, the Government Factor, and the Community Factor. First, Law no. 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications does not explicitly regulate the Mark Holder but regulates the goods of the brand. Second, the Department of Industry and Commerce and the Ministry of Law and Human Rights are still lacking in personnel or expert staff in the field of trademarks within the Department of Industry and Commerce recognized as an obstacle in the process of fostering or socializing business actors who cheat in the trading process which is considered not only detrimental to the Trademark Rights Holder but also including the consumers in it. Third, consumers or buyers who prefer imitation brand goods at low prices for the sake of a lifestyle.References
Books
James, Engel F, Blackwell R. D, and Miniard. P. W. (1994). Perilaku Konsumen. Budiyanto, Trans. Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara.
Kurnia, T. S. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia Pasca Perjanjian TRIP’s. Bandung: PT. Alumni.
Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rizaldi, J. (2009). Perlindungan Kemasan Produk Merek Terkenal Terhadap Persaingan Curang. Bandung: PT.Alumni.
Serfiyani, C. Y., Hariyanti, I., & Serfianto, D. P. (2017). Buku Pintar HAKI dan Warisan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press Hasibuan.
Sudaryat, Sudjana, & Rika R. P. (2010). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Bandung: Oase Media.
Sugiyono, (2015). Metode Penelitian Kombinasi (Mix Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sunggono, B. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Supramono, G. (2008). Menyelesaikan Sengketa Merek Menurut Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Trisdiharto, T. H. (2017). Pengaruh Faktor Sosial dan Personal terhaadp Sikap dan Niat Beli Konsumen untuk Barang Palsu di Kota Denpasar dan Kabupaten Badung. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.
Wediono, K. (2016). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Yogyakarta: Ombak.
Journal Article
Hidayati, N. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Merek yang Terdaftar. Ragam Jurnal Pengembangan Humanivora, 11(3), 23.
Nugroho, R. A., & Santoso, B., & Mahmudah, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang Terkenal Asing (Well Known Mark) Dari Tindakan Passing Off (Studi Sengketa GS Atas Nama GS Yuasa Corporation). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5(3), 40.
Suherman, A. M. (2004). Penegakan Hukum Atas Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Di Indoensia. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 23(1), 59.
Journal article with DOI
Arifin, Z., & Iqbal, M. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Yang Terdaftar. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 5(1),50 . DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i1.2117.
Marwiyah, S. (2010). Perlindungan Hukum atas Merek Terkenal. Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 2(1),44 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v2i1.50.
Sudjana S. (2018). Implikasi Perlindungan Indikasi Geografis Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Terhadap Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal. Veritas et Justitia, 4(1),50 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.2915.
Valerie, N., & Edbert, S. H. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Christian Dior Ditinjau Dari Konsep Trademark Dilution. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 4(2),29 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.3376/jch.v4i2.132.
Wijaya E. L. F. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Atas Kesamaan Bunyi Merek Terhadap Barang Yang Tidak Sejenis. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 5(2),174 . DOI: https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.18 7.
Yessiningrum W, R. (2015). Perlindungan Hukum Indikasi Geografis Sebagai Bagian Dari Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 3(1),73 . DOI: https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1 2345/ius.v3i7.198.
Yustia, M., & Ayu R. S. (2014). Passing Off Dalam Pendaftaran Merek, Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 224 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2014. Jurnal Yudisial, 7(3),256 . DOI: 10.29313/sh.v16i1.5133.
Website
Dirjen HKI. Nomor Merek Nike di Indonesia. 2020. https://pdkiindonesia.dgip.go.id/index.php/merek/ZnV4b1ErWjMwWjVvWGJIZkloNWZTdz09?q=Nike%2C+Inc.&type=1&skip=0 (accessed 11 24, 2020).
Fryzia, A. Gaya Hidup Perilaku Konsumtif. 2018. www.kompasiana.com/adelia_fryzia21/gaya-hidup-remaja-konsumtif (accessed 09 13, 2019).
Sa, L. Pasar Klithikan Jogja. 2017. https://www.inibaru.id/adventurial/berburu-barang-antik-dan-unik-di-pasar-klitikan (accessed 11 05, 2020).
Wibowo, D. M.Pasar Klithikan: Menawar Bebas dan Kualitas Kadang Berkelas. 2019. https://www.wartaekonomi.co.id/read193582/pasar-klithikan-menawar-bebas-dan-kualitas-kadang-berkelas (accessed 09 28, 2020).
Website Document
Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Perdata. Retrieved from http://www.dilmil-jakarta.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Kitab-Undang-Undang-Hukum-Perdata.pdf.
Kitab Undang- Undang Hukum Pidana. Retrieved from http://kejari-sukoharjo.go.id/file/087938fe4b830aeb386f318f3b605198.pdf.
Undang- Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Retrieved from https://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/1684.pdf.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 23 Tahun 1993 tentang Tata Cara Permintaan Pendaftaran Merek. Retrieved from https://ngada.org/pp23-1993.htm#:~:text=(1)Permintaan%20pendaftaran%20merek%20diajukan,dilampirkan%20pada%20Peraturan%20Pemerintah%20ini.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1993 tentang Kelas Barang atau Jasa bagi pendaftaran Merek. Retrieved from http://dik.ipb.ac.id/PDF/pp_24_1993_kelas_brg_atau_jasa_bagi_pendaftaran_merek.pdf.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.
