Praktik Pemenuhan Kewajiban Kelaiklautan Kapal Kargo Oleh Pengangkut Terhadap Ancaman Cyberattack

Authors

  • Stephen Wongso Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Sinta Dewi Rosadi Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Purnama Trisnamansyah Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Fauzi Maulana Hakim Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i2.4242

Keywords:

Industri Pengangkutan, Kewajiban Kelaiklautan, Serangan Siber

Abstract

Cyberattack issue in the shipping industries which was happened through some incidents towards ships, made the protection of cargo owners need to be reviewed. The seaworthiness obligation which interpreted as a means for a vessel to be fit to face the foreseeable perils in a voyage, makes cyberattack create its own discourse. This should not be separated with the cyberattack threat which has not been understood as an ordinary peril of a voyage. Moreover, the regulations in Indonesia which does not adopt the Hague-Visby Rules 1924, makes the industry fully rely on the Indonesian Shipping Law as a legal basis. The normative juridical research method makes the emphasis of the research on the use of library sources. The research specification uses an analytical descriptive that describes a literature study on the obligation of seaworthiness in dealing with the threat of cyberattack both in practice and regulation. The results of this study found that, first, the implementation of due diligence by the carrier in order to fulfil its seaworthiness obligations must also be applied to deal with the threat of cyberattack. The nature of the cyberattack that attacks the ship's information systems and technology, should make this attack predictable in a voyage. Moreover, the carrier's compliance with the cyber risk management guidelines on the ship should make the carrier declared to have fulfilled its seaworthiness obligations. Second, there is a legal vacuum in Indonesian positive law in regulating seaworthiness obligations in the face of cyberattack threats. Moreover, the legal gap between Indonesia's positive law and the 1924 HVR makes it difficult for Indonesian practitioners to follow global standards.

References

Buku

Brian Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, St. Paul, Thomson Reuters

Asikin, Amiruddin dan Zainal. (2014). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo

Baughen,Simon. (2018). Shipping Law. Oxfordshire: Routledge

Soemitro dan Ronny Hanitijo. (1983). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia,

Artikel Jurnal

Bellsola Olba, “State of the Art of Port Simulation Models for Risk and Capacity Assessment Based on the Vessel Navigational Behaviour Through the Nautical Infrastructureâ€, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering

Ben Farah, “Cybersecurity in the Maritime Industry: A Systematic Survey of Recent Advances and Future Trendsâ€, Maritime Digital Information, 2022

Frank Akpan, “Cybersecurity Challenges in the Maritime Sectorâ€, Network Journal Studies, Vol.2, 2022,

Ian Davis, “Perils of the Sea: the Bunga Seroja Caseâ€, Maritime Studies Journal 103, 1998

Nobuo Takeda, “Marine Accident Investigation Reportâ€, Japan Transport Safety Board

Website

Andrew Kinsey. 2021. Cyber Security Threats Challenge International Shipping Industry dari. https://www.maritimeprofessional.com/news/cyber-security-threats-challenge-international-369770

Dokumen Hukum Lainnya

Actis Co.Ltd v. The Sanko Steamship Co.Ltd (“The Aquacharmâ€) [1982] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 7

Bradley & Sons v. Federal Steam Navigation Co. [1926] 24 Lloyds Rep 446, para.454 (C.A. per Scruttion L.J.)

Cia Sud Americana De Vapores v. Sinochem Tianjin Import & Export Corp (“The Aconcaguaâ€) [2010] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 1

Empresa Cubana Importada De Alimentos “Alimport†v. Iasmos Shipping Co. S.A. (“The Good Friendâ€) [1984] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 586

Gilroy Sons & Co v. W R Price & Co [1893] AC 56

Great China Material Industries Co Ltd v. Malaysian International Shipping Corporation Berhad (“Bunga Serojaâ€) [1998] 196 CLR 161

Hang Fung v. Mullion [1966] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 511

IACS Recommendation No.166

IMO MSC Fal.1/Circ.3

Kopitoff v. Wilson [1876] 1 QBD 377

McFadden v. Blue Star Line, 1 K.B. 697 para.192

Steel v. State Line Steamship Co [1877] 3 App Cas 72

Virginia Carolina Chemical Co v. Norfolk and North American Steam Shipping Co [1912] 1 KB 229

Published

2023-05-07

How to Cite

Wongso, S., Rosadi, S. D., Trisnamansyah, P., & Hakim, F. M. (2023). Praktik Pemenuhan Kewajiban Kelaiklautan Kapal Kargo Oleh Pengangkut Terhadap Ancaman Cyberattack. Widya Yuridika, 6(2), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i2.4242