Konstruksi Kewenangan Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dalam Memberikan Keterangan pada Perkara Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi

M. Adib Akmal Hamdi; Xavier Nugraha; Gio Arjuna Putra

doi:10.31328/wy.v6i2.4255

Authors

M. Adib Akmal Hamdi Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga
Xavier Nugraha Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga
Gio Arjuna Putra Faculty of Law, Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i2.4255

Keywords:

People's Consultative Assembly, Code of Procedures on Judicial Review of Law Against The Constitution, Constitutional Interpretation.

Abstract

In the light of this background, the focus of this article is on 3 (three) issues namely: the MPR's authority to interpret the constitution, the construction of ius constitutum providing statements by the MPR in reviewing laws in the Constitutional Court, and the reconstruction of the ius constituendum model of providing information on requests for review of laws law in the Constitutional Court. This article is a legal research with a reform-oriented research type with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Based on this research, several things were found, namely: (1) the Peopleâ€™s Consultative Assembly has the authority to interpret the constitution based on Article 3 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; (2) the construction of the ius constitutum position of the Peopleâ€™s Consultative Assembly in the petition for review of a law at the Constitutional Court is derogated by the exclusion of the MPR as giving explanation in Constitutional Court Law Number 6 Year 2005; (3) at the ius constituendum level, the involvement of the Peopleâ€™s Consultative Assembly in carrying out originalism interpretation of the constitution can be realized through the provision of explanation in a tripartite manner, namely the Government and/or the DPR as legislators and the Peopleâ€™s Consultative Assembly as the framers of the constitution. This article provides recommendations for the need to amend the provisions of the Constitutional Court's procedural law, so as to provide space for substantive participation for the MPR in providing an interpretation of its constitution.

References

Buku

Arizona, Y. (2014). Konstitusionalisme Agraria. STPN Press.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2016). Konstitusi Ekonomi. PT. Kompas Media Nusantara.

Balkin, J. M. (2011). Living Originalism. The Belknapp of Harvard University Press.

Carias, A. R. B. (2011). Constitutional Courts as Positive Legislators: A Comparative Law Study. Cambridge University Press.

Chemerinsky, E. (1987). Interpreting The Constitutions. Praeger Publishers.

Compton, J. W. (2014). The Evangelical Origins of The Constitution. Harvard University Press.

Dworkin, R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press.

Farber, D. A., & Sherry, S. (2009). Judgement Calls: Principle and Politics in Constitutional Law. Oxford University Press.

Friedmann, L. M., & Hayden, G. M. (2017). American Law an Introduction (3rd Editio). Oxford University Press.

Hutchinson, T. (2018). Researching and Writing in Law. Thomson Reuters (Professional) Australia Limited

Hobbes, T. (2010). Leviathan or The Matter, Forme, & Power of Common-Wealth Ecclestiasticall and Civill. Yale University Press.

Isra, S. (2020). Lembaga Negara: Konsep, Sejarah, Wewenang, dan Dinamika Konstitusional. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Kelsen, H. (1991). General Theory of Norms (translated by Michael Hartney). Oxford University Press.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Mendes, C. H. (2013). Constitutional Courts and Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press.

Mochtar, Z. A. (2021). Kekuasaan Kehakiman Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Diskursus Judicial Activism Vs Judicial Restraint. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Oâ€™Connor, S. D. (2004). The Majesty of The Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice. Random House, Inc.

Safaâ€™at, M. A., Riewanto, A., Faiz, P. M., Ghoffar, A., Novitasari, A. W., Firdaus, S. U., Anggono, B. D., Bisariyadi, Kasim, H., & Eddyono, L. W. (2019). Hukum Acara Mahkamah Konstitusi (Edisi Revisi). Kepaniteraan dan Sekretaris Jenderal Mahkamah Konstitusi.

Soeprapto, M. F. I. (2007). lmu Perundang-undangan: Jenis, Fungsi, dan Materi Muatan. PT. Kanisius.

Strauss, D. A. (2010). The Living Constitution. Oxford University Press.

Sweet, A. S. (2002). Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe (Oxford). Oxford University Press.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2004). On The Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory. Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, E. W. (2005). The Judicial Process: Realism, Pragmatism, Practical Reasoning and Principles. Cambridge University Press.

Wheare, K. C. (1996). Modern Constitutions. Oxford University Press.

Whittington, K. E. (2007). Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The President, The Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S History. Princeton University Press.

Book Chapter

Mason, S. A. (1996). The Interpretation of a Constitution in A Modern Liberal Democracy. In C. Sampford & K. Preston (Ed.), Interpreting Constitutions, Theories, Principles, and Constitutions. The Federation Press.

Artikel Jurnal

Abrianto, B.O., Sri Winarsi, Xavier Nugraha, Patricia Inge Felany. (2021). Citizen Lawsuit as a Legal Effort on Government Eco-Unfriendly Action, Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11 (4).

Bittker, B. I. (1996). Interpreting The Constitution: Is The Intent of The Framers Controlling? If Not, What Is? Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 19(1).

Fleming, J. E. (2012). Living Originalism and Living Constitutionalism as Moral Readings of The American Constitution. Boston University Law Review, 92.

Isra, S., & Amsari, F. (2019). Perubahan Konstitusi Melalui Tafsir Hakim. BPHN.

Limbach, J. (2001). The Concept of The Supremacy of The Constitution. The Modern Law Review, 64(1).

Llewellyn, K. N. (1931). Some Realism About Realism: Responding to Dean Pound. Harvard Law Review, 44(8).

Murphy, W. F. (1986). Who Shall Interpret? The Quest for The Ultimate Constitutional Interpretation. The Review of Politics, 48(3).

Rehnquist, W. H. (1976). The Notion of A Living Constitution. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 29(2).

Rosenfeld, M. (1993). Executive Autonomy, Judicial Authority, and The Rule of Law: Reflections on Constitutional Interpretation and The Separation of Powers. Cardozo Law Review, 15.

Setiawan, P. J., Xavier Nugraha, Luisa Srihandayani. (2022). Konsep Penegakan Hukum Yang Sistematis Dalam Perselisihan Pra-Yudisial Di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29 (1).

Setiawan, P.J., Xavier Nugraha, Vincentius Sutanto, Marchethy Riwani Diaz. (2021). Konstitusionalitas Perbuatan Tidak Menyenangkan Sebagai Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian: Analisis Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: Se/6/X/2015, Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 8(1).