The Regulation Model of Public Services Based on The Integrity Zone in The Religious Higher Education in Indonesia

Khoirul Hidayah; Muhammad In'am Esha; Shofil Fikri

doi:10.31328/wy.v6i3.4499

Authors

Khoirul Hidayah The Department of Islamic Law, Faculty of Sharia , Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Muhammad In'am Esha The Department of Islamic Education Management, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Shofil Fikri The Department of Islamic Economic Law, Faculty of Sharia , Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2679-6660

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i3.4499

Keywords:

Anti-Bribery, Integrity Zone, Minimum Service Standard

Abstract

Since 2020, Indonesian Ministry of Religious Affairs commits to build the integrity zone in all its work units. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang has been pointed to be the pilot project of The Integrity Zone Establishment in 2020 under the Ministry of Religious Affairsâ€™ supervision. The emerged problem is that there is no Minimum Service Standard (MSS) as the requirement of integrity zone made by rector. This is a juridical-empirical study by applying qualitative approach. The primary data were from interview and Focus Group Discussion with structural team and academic staff who are directly involved in services in the said university. The FGD results reveal that the MSS is made based on The Organization and Work Procedures of UIN Malang, and that it is related to services in Tri Dharma both academic and non-academic. The MSS of UIN Malang must refer to Permen PAN-RB No. 10 of 2019 on the amendment to Permen PAN-RB No. 52 of 2014 concerning The Guidelines to Establish an Integrity Zone towards a Corruption Free Area and a Clean and Serving Bureaucratic Area in a Government Institution. The service regulation is also made based on international standard ISO 37001: 2016 as an anti-bribery management system that is able to provide access for complaint on bribery. This article is expected to be the policy reference for services in the State Religious Higher Education in Indonesia which follows the service standard of the integrity zone and international standard so they can lessen the corruption and collusion in the serving process.

References

A. H. N. Chadijah, Siti, D. K. Wardhani, Zona Integritas dan pengendalian gratifikasi dalam peralihan hak atas tanah pada Kantor Pertahanan di Indonesia, Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4(1) (2021) pp. 41â€“53. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12663

A. Purnamasari, Kushandajani, Peningkatan pelayanan publik RSUP Dr. Kariadi Semarang yang akuntabel dan anti korupsi dalam mempertahankan Zona Integritas Wilayah Bebas Korupsi dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Melayani, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 8(4) (2019) pp. 51â€“60.

Audit Results documents of Exit Meeting Internal Assessment on the ZI Establishment in Faculty of Sharia, UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang in March 31, 2021.

C. Philippou, Towards a unified framework for anti-bribery in sport governance. Int J Discl Gov 16 (2) (2019) 83â€“99. DOI:10.1057/s41310-019-00058-w

D. S. Wilujeng, O. L. Pramudyastuti, Evaluasi penerapan Zona Integritas menuju Wilayah Bebas dari Korupsi dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Melayani (Studi pembangunan Zona Integritas Rumah Sakit Jiwa Prof. Dr. Soerojo Magelang), Journal of Economic, Management, Accounting and Technology 3(2) (2020) 127â€“35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32500/jematech.v3i2.1286.

E. K. Spahn. Implementing global anti-bribery norms: from the foreign corrupt practices act to the OECD anti-bribery convention to the UN convention against corruption, The 23rd Ind. Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 1, 2013. 13-16

F. M. J. Teichmann, Incentive systems in anti-bribery whistleblowing, Journal of Financial Crime 26(2) (2019) 519-525. DOI: https://doi.org/10. 1108/JFC-04-2018-0041

H. Julia, H. Purnaweni, B. P. Priyadi, Implementasi pembangunan Zona Integritas menuju Wilayah Bebas dari Korupsi dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih dan Melayani di BBWS Pemali Juana Semarang, Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik 1(1) (2019) 25â€“42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.14710/dialogue.v1i1.5222

I. Caesaringi, P. Harsasto, D. G. Manar, Reformasi birokrasi Kota Tegal (Studi kasus Zona Integritas bebas korupsi dan birokrasi bersih BP2T dan RSUD Kardinah), Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Undip 6(3) (2017) pp. 41â€“50.

I. I. Astuti, Budaya 5S sebagai wujud reformasi birokrasi dalam pelayanan publik di SMK SMAK Padang, Kebijakan: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi 12(2) (2021) 137â€“44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.23969/kebijakan.v12i2.4044

I. S. Agustina, Implementasi kebijakan Zona Integritas dalam mewujudkan pelayanan publik di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Bandung, PhD Dissertation, Universitas Gadjah Mada, 2019.

J. Zhang, R. Chiu, L. Wei, Decision-making process of internal whistleblowing behavior in China: empirical evidence and implications, Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1) (2009) 25-41. DOI:10.1007/s10551-008-9831-z

L. Riyandari, Pengaruh kompetensi, komitmen organisasi, motivasi kerja, dan pengawasan terhadap efektivitas program Zona Integritas di Polres Banyumas, Majalah Ilmiah Dinamika Administrasi 18(1) (2021) pp.1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56681/da.v18i1.39

M. Kubiciel, Der EU anti-corruptions report: ein neuer weg zu einer kohÃ¤renten prÃ¤ventionspolitik [in German], HRRS (HÃ¶chstrichterliche Rechtsprechung Zum Strafrecht) 2013(6) (2013) 213-219.

OECD (2003), Annex to the recommendation of the council on OECD guidelines for managing conflict of interest in the public service, 2-14, 2003. Available at: www.oecd.org/gov/ethics/ 2957360.pdf (accessed in August 9, 2022).

The Documents of â€œRencana Strategis Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malangâ€, [2018]