Kedudukan Hukum Adat: Sebuah Perbandingan Hukum Positif di Beberapa Negara

Authors

  • Galih Puji Mulyoto Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
  • Galih Puji Mulyono Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Khotbatul Laila Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Dhaniar Eka Budiastanti Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang
  • Anindya Bidasari Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kanjuruahan Malang
  • Selvia Wisuda Fakultas Hukum Universitas Merdeka Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v7i1.4569

Keywords:

Customary law, Positive Law, Source of law, Law enforcement

Abstract

The existence of customary law in positive law often creates ambiguity in the implementation of law enforcement and legal sources. There is a problem here with this principle placing customary law as a source of law. The purpose of this paper is to provide input on the position of customary law in positive law in Indonesia by comparing several Anglo-Saxon and civil law countries. This research method uses normative legal research with a comparative approach. The results and discussion in this study describe the position of customary law in Indonesia, the Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei Darussalam. The positive laws of these countries regulate the position of customary law in its position as a source of law and law enforcement. Customary law in the Philippines is a dispute resolution tool related to community problems with customary law so that there is no overlap in the enforcement of laws and regulations. Customary law in Malaysia is not codified in the customary law, it is codified in the law. Courts do not play a role in the development of customary law. Customary law is also developed by the courts. Positive law that applies to all society positive law applies to all society. Brunei Darussalam still lives in society and is still widely used positive law is the law that applies to all communities and customary law is the main source of law in Brunei Darussalam.

References

Ahmad, A. H. (2021). Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Sistem Hukum Eropa Kontinental dan Anglosaxon Dalam Sistem Peradilan di Negara Republik Indonesia. PETITUM, 9(1), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.36090/jh.v9i1.997.

Asriati, A., & Muhdar, M. (2020). Studi Perbandingan Hak-Hak Masyarakat Adat: Hukum Nasional Dan Hukum Internasional. PETITUM, 8(2), 170-186. https://doi.org/10.36090/jh.v8i2.768.

Bernas, Joaquin. Ancestral domain vs regalian doctrine (2). Philippine Daily Inquirer. Diakses pada 18 Juli 2020

Handoko, D. (2019). Politik Hukum Kriminalisasi dan Dekriminalisasi di Bidang Hak Cipta. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 13(1), 99-122. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.V13.99-122.

Balao, James M. (1983). The Land Problem of the Cordillera National Minorities, Paper Presented at the First Multi-Sectoral Land Congress (Mar. 11-14, 1983) supra note 17, at 13.

Gaspar, Karl M. (2000). The Lumad’s Struggle in The Face of Globalization, supra note 3.

Owen J. Lynch, (1982). Native Title, Private Right and Tribal Land Law: An Introductory Survey, 57 PHILIPPINE L.J. 268, 274.

Rindawan, I. K. (2017). Peranan Awig-Awig dalam Melestarikan Adat dan Budaya di Bali. Widya Accarya, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.46650/wa.7.1.433.%p.

Soekanto, Soerjono dan Mamudji, Sri. (2007). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada).

Sulastriyono, Sulastriyono; Intaning Pradhani, Sartika. (2022). Pemikiran Hukum Adat Djojodigoeno dan Relevansinya Kini. Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, [S.l.], v. 30, n. 3, p. 448-462, oct. 2018. ISSN 2443-0994. Available at: <https://www.jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/view/36956>. Date accessed: 22 june 2022. /*doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jmh.36956. */ doi:https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.36956.

Wulandari, C., Pujirahayu, E. W., Hiariej, E. O. S., Hassan, M. S., & Kambuno, J. A. (2022). Penal Mediation: Criminal Case Settlement Process based on the Local Customary Wisdom of Dayak Ngaju. Lex Scientia Law Review, 6(1), 69-92. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v6i1.54896.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-03

How to Cite

Mulyoto, G. P., Mulyono, G. P., Laila, K., Budiastanti, D. E., Bidasari, A., & Wisuda, S. (2024). Kedudukan Hukum Adat: Sebuah Perbandingan Hukum Positif di Beberapa Negara. Widya Yuridika, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v7i1.4569

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Law and Society

Section

Articles

License

AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions

  • Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
  • Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal

========================================
Editor-in-Chief

Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.