Ketidaksesuaian Penyampaian Harga Tanah: Tanggung Jawab Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i3.4589Keywords:
Responsibility, PPAT, Deed of sale & purchase, Transaction Price, Tanggung Jawab, Akta Jual Beli, Harga Transaksi.Abstract
This study aims to analyze the PPAT's responsibility for the land sale and purchase deed he made in the event that the parties do not convey the actual land price and analyze the validity and consequences that will arise if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual land price. This research is normative research, where in this research the subject matter of the study is in the form of the application of normative law in action to any particular legal event that occurs in society. The results of the study show that if the PPAT knows that the price entered by the parties is included in the sale and purchase agreement, the PPAT must refuse to make the sale and purchase deed. In addition, it is mandatory for PPAT as an extension of the government to play an active role in providing counseling or guidance to prospective buyers and sellers not to reduce the actual price of the land sale and purchase price between them. Then regarding the validity and consequences that will arise in the future if the land sale and purchase deed does not include the actual price of the land and without the PPAT knowing as the maker, it can result in the land sale and purchase deed (authentic deed) degrading its evidentiary power to a private deed because it has been made with ways that deviate or are not in accordance with procedures both materially and formally. And it is possible that in the future it will be discovered that the price stated in the land sale and purchase deed is incorrect, so there is a possibility that the parties (seller and buyer) may be entangled in Article 266 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code.References
Buku
Ahmadi Miru dan Sutarman Yodo. (2014). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Andy Hartanto. (2015). Panduan Lengkap Hukum Praktis Kepemilikan Tanah. Surabaya: Laksbang Justitia.
Achmad Rubaie. (2007). Hukum Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum. Malang: Bayumedia.
Adrian Sutedi. (2008). Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Boedi Harsono. (2013). Hukum Agraria Indonesia. Sejarah Pembentukan Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Jakarta: Universitas Tisakti.
Bachtiar Effendi. (1993). Kumpulan Tulisa tentang Hukum Tanah. Bandung: Alumni.
Effendi Perangin. (1994.) Praktik Jual beli Tanah. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum (Pilihan Metode dan Praktik Penulisan Artikel). Yogyakarta: Mira Buana Cetakan 1.
Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra. (2015). Reforma Agraria Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Muljadi. Kartini dan Gunawan. (2003) Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
R. Notodisoerjo. (1982). Hukum Notaris di Indonesia suatu penjelasan, edisi pertama. Jakarta: CV Rajawali.
R.Soegondo Notodisoerjo. (1969). Tata Cara Pengangkatan Pejabat Umum. Jakarta: Intan Pariwara.
Samsaimun. (2018). Peraturan PPAT Pengantar Peraturan Jabatan PPAt dalam peralihan Hak Atas Tanah di Indonesia. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.
Suharnoko. (2004). Hukum Perjanjian Teori dan Analisa Kasus. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Salim HS. (2016). Teknik Pembuatan Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.
Tan Thong Kie. (2007). Studai Notariat Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris. Jakarta: Ictiar Baru Van Hoeve.
Jurnal
Mariano Putra Prayoga Sumangkut dan Ghansham Anand. (2017). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Peralihan Aset Yayasan Keagamaan Yang Diperoleh Melalui Hibah Bersyarat Tanpa Akta Otentik (Kajian Putusan Nomor 2016 K/Pdt/2013). Jurnal Al’Adi. Volume IX Nomor 3.
Pieter Latumeten. (2009). Kongres XX Ikatan Notaris Indonesia Kebatatan dan Degradasi Kekuatan Bukti Akta Notaris Serta Model Aktanya.
Ronal Ravianto dan Amin Purnawan. (2017). Peran PPAT Dalam Pemungutan Bea Perolehan Hak Atas Tanah Dan Bangunan (BPHTB) Dengan Pendekatan Self Assessment System. Jurnal Akta.
Saktisila Widjono. W. (2013). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Pelaksanaan Pasal 91 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah Di Kota Medan. Tesis. Magister Kenotariatan. Fakultas Hukum. Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Peraturan Perundang-undangan
KUHPerdata
KUHPidana
Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.
