Mahkamah Konstitusi Setengah-Hati: Final tetapi Tidak Mengikat dalam Kewenangan Pengujian Konstitusional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v7i1.4678Keywords:
Final dan Mengikat, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Negara Hukum, Supremacy-of-Text Principle.Abstract
This article aims to discuss the bindingness of constitutional review decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia (MKRI). In particular, this article looks at the relevance between the grand design of the nature of the MKRI decision in Article 24C paragraph (1) The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD NRI 1945) with the practice of constitution disobedience. Based on that issue, this article argues that the MKRI is designed not to have a final and binding decision, but only final decisions. Because based on the Supremacy-of-Text Principle which is coherent with the concept of applying law based on regulations in the Rule of Law, the non-appreance of binding phrases in Article 24C paragraph (1) of the 1945 UUD NRI 1945 makes the decision of the Constitutional Court in the authority of constitutional review has no binding legal force. Grammatical argumentation comes from interpretation with original meaning and textualism methods which find that the word final does not mean binding due the two words stand separately. By drawing on the concepts of strong-form judicial review and weak-form judicial review, the non-binding nature of MKRI decisions can legitimize the disagreement. Because the indecisivenesss of the Constitution establish a half-hearted form of MKRI, namely the partial weak-form judicial review. Thus, the form of MKRI is a strong and weak-form judicial review that makes MKRI decisions can be opposed. This article uses normative research methods with conceptual approach, statutory approach, and comparative approach.References
Buku
Asrun, M. A. (2004) Krisis Peradilan Mahkamah Agung di Bawah Soeharto. ELSAM
Bachtiar. (2018). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Unpam Press.
Balkin, J. M. (2014). Living Originalism. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press
Hermawan, M. I. (2020). Teori Penafsiran Konstitusi. Kencana.
Kurnia, T. S. (2014). Konstitusi HAM. Pustaka Pelajar.
_____________. (2018). Interpetasi Hak-Hak Asasi Manusia Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia The Jimly Court 2003-2008. Mandar Maju.
Scalia, A., Garner, B. A. (2012). Reading law: The interpretation of legal texts. St. Paul: Thomson/West.
Sirajuddin. (2016). Legislative Drafting: Pelembagaan Metode Partisipatif dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Setara Press.
Twining, W., Miers, D. (2010) How to Do Things with Rules. Cambridge University Press.
Bab dalam Buku
Levy, L. W. (2005). Judicial Review, Sejarah, & Demokrasi: Sebuah Pengantar. Dalam Leonard W. Levy (ed), Judicial Review: Sejarah Kelahiran, Wewenang, dan Fungsinya dalam Negara Demokrasi. Nusamedia.
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2009). A Concise Guide to The Rule of Law. Dalam Gianluigi Palombella dan Neil Walker (eds), Relocating the Rule of Law. Hart Publishing.
Artikel Jurnal
Anonim. (2007). Original Meaning and Its Limits. Harvard Law Review Notes, 1279-1280. https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/02/original_meaning.pdf
Bhat, S. A., Mir. M. (2020). Law of Interpretation to Fulfill the Aim and Object of Legislature: An Analysis. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 7(9), 802-810. http://doi.one/10.1729/Journal.24627
Carver, P. (2008). Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law, Mark Tushnet. Alberta Law Review, 46(1), 243-251. https://doi.org/10.29173/alr246
Indrayana, D., & Mochtar, Z. A. (2007). Komparasi Sifat Mengikat Putusan Judicial Review Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Mimbar Hukum, 19(3), 437-454. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.19074
Izzaty, R. (2020). Urgensi Ketentuan Carry-Over dalam Pembentukan Undang-undang di Indonesia. Jurnal Ham, 11(1), 85-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.85-98
Kauper, P. G. (1961). The Supreme Court and the Rule of Law. Michigan Law Review. 59(4). 531-552. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i254853
Kordela, M. (2008). The Principle of Legal Certainty as A Fundamental Element of The Formal Concept of The Rule Of Law. Revue du Notariat, 110, 587-605. https://doi.org/10.7202/1045553ar
Kurnia, T. S. (2012). Konsep Negara Berbasis Hak Sebagai Argumen Justifikasi Pengujian Konstitusionalitas Undang-Undang. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(3), 563-582. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk937
Lawson, G. S., & Calabresi, S. (2014). The Rule of Law as a Law of Law. Notre Dame Law Review, 90, 483-504. https://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol90/iss2/1
Michelman, F., I. (2004). Justice as Fairness, Legitimacy, and the Question of Judicial Review: A Comment. Fordham Law Review, 72(5), 1407-1420. http://fordhamlawreview.org/issues/justice-as-fairness-legitimacy-and-the-question-of-judicial-review-a-comment/
Mulya, J., & Dikrurahman, D. (2022). The Role of Legal Language in Formulating Written Legal Rules in Indonesia. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 5(2), 11386-11394. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v5i2.4961
Nachbar, T. B. (2020). Twenty-First Century Formalism. University of Miami Law Review, 75(1), 113-189. https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol75/iss1/4
Ningrum, D. A. W., & Antikowati, A. (2022). Format Ideal Tindak Lanjut Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk Mengefektifkan Asas Erga Omnes. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2), 314-358. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1924
Scalia, A. (1989). The Rule of Law as A Law of Rules. The University of Chicago Law Review, 56(4), 1175-1188. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol56/iss4/1
Shidarta, S. (2017). Laws of Language and Legal Language: A Study of Legal Language in Some Indonesian Regulations. Humaniora, 8(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v8i1.3700
Soeroso, F. L. (2014). Aspek Keadilan Dalam Sifat Final Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(1), 64-84. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/download/1114/10
Strauss, D. A. (2008). On the Origin of Rules (with Apologies to Darwin): A Comment on Antonin Scalia's The Rule of Law as a Law of Rules. The University of Chicago Law Review, 75(3), 997-1013. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclrev/vol75/iss3/2
Tamanaha B., Z. (2012). The History and Elements of The Rule of Law. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, 140, 232-247. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24872211
Tushnet M., V. (2003). Alternative Forms of Judicial Review. Michigan Law Review, 101, 2781-2802. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol101/iss8/9
_____________. (2006). Weak-Form Judicial Review and “Core†Civil Liberties. Harvard Civil Rights, 41, 1-22. https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1231&context=facpub
Laporan
Arnold, R. (2006). Interrelations Between The Constitutional Court and Ordinary Court. European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission) with The Constitutional Court of Azerbaijan, 11. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-JU(2006)044prog-e
Kamus
Garner, B. A. (ed). (1999) Black Law Dictionary 7th Edition. West Publishing Company, College & School Division.
Kamus Daring
Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Daring. (2023). Diakses melalui https://kbbi.web.id.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang No. 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2003 Nomor 98, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 4316) sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2011 Nomor 70, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5226) sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2013 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Menjadi Undang-Undang (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2014 Nomor 5, Tambahan Lembara Negara Nomor 5456) dan sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan Ketiga Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 Tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2020 Nomor 216, Tambahan Lembaran Negara 6554).
Undang-Undang No. 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2011 Nomor 82, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5234) sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang No. 15 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Pertama atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Lembaran Negara Tahun 2019 Nomor 183, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 6398) dan sebagaimana telah diubah terakhir dengan Undang-Undang No. 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan (Tambahan Lembaran Negara Tahun 2022 Nomor 143, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 6801).
The Constitution of the Republic of Albania, 1998.
The Constitution of the Republic of Iraq, 2005.
The Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand, 2017.
The Constitution of the Kingdom of the Netherlands.
Germany Federal Constitutional Court Act, 1951.
The Constitutional Act on The Constitutional Court of The Republic of Croatia number 49/2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.
