Konsep Pentahelix Pada Pemberdayaan Usaha Mikro dan Kecil

Authors

  • Shisca Elvetta Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Tarsisius Murwadji Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Etty Mulyati Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v7i1.4759

Keywords:

Empowerment of digital MSEs, Institutional, Marketplace, Pentahelix

Abstract

Empowerment according to Article 1 Number 8 of the MSME Law, is defined as an effort by the central government, regional governments, the business world, and the community in a synergistic manner. However, the fact that the implementation of the empowerment of digital micro and small enterprises (MSEs) in the marketplace by these stakeholders has actually become an inhibiting factor for the success of the programs carried out. As a result, the empowerment of the implementation program has not provided optimal results for the development and growth of digital MSEs in the marketplace. This research is based on a normative juridical approach and then analyzed by qualitative juridical methods. The specification of this research is analytical descriptive in order to describe the relationships between relevant stakeholders in providing support for the digital MSE empowerment program in the marketplace which is reviewed based on regulations and implementation in practice. The results of this study found that, first, the implementation of digital MSE empowerment in the marketplace by the government, the business world, universities, and communities is still partial and sectoral, resulting in overlapping programs. Second, the application of the Pentahelix concept to efforts to empower digital MSEs in the marketplace can be done by establishing the Pentahelix Institution, which is an entity that forms cooperative relationships between five stakeholders, consisting of the government, the business world, academia, the public, and the media. Furthermore, the formation of these institutions needs to be set forth in the form of laws and regulations.

References

Adi, Isbandi Rukminto. (2012). Intervensi Komunitas & Pengembangan Masyarakat sebagai Upaya Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Arsad, Romli. (2016). Hukum dan Peran Koperasi dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Kerakyatan. Sumedang: Alqaprint Jatinangor.

Deloitte. (2015). UKM Pemicu Kemajuan Indonesia, Deloitte Access Economics, Report.

Hidayat, Mohammad Firman, dkk. (2018). Diagnosis Pertumbuhan Indonesia: Prioritas Strategi untuk Mendorong Pertumbuhan Ekonomi. Jakarta: Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.

Kusumaatmadja, Mochtar. (1965). Pembinaan Hukum dalam Rangka Pembangunan Nasional, Bandung: Bina Cipta.

Tim Kebijakan Peningkatan Kapasitas Ekonomi Sekretariat TNP2K dan Lembaga Demografi FEB Universitas Indonesia. (2021). Pemetaan Program Pemberdayaan Usaha Mikro, Kecil, dan Menengah (UMKM). Jakarta: Tim Nasional Percepatan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan.

S, Vina Salviana Darvina. (2021). Monograf Model Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Partisipatif Integratif, Malang: Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang.

Sukarsa, Dadang Epi, dkk. (2022). Aspek Hukum Penguatan UMK Digital Lokal di Marketplace (Kajian Teoritis Lingkungan Ekonomi Digital). Bandung: Yayasan Pendidikan Nasional.

A, Teguh Tresna Puja dan Murwadji, Tarsisius. (2020). Telaah Yuridis Penerapan Konsep Quadruplehelix pada Pelaksanaan CSR Bagi UMKM. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 17(1), 38-50.

Ansell, Chris dan Gash, Alison. (2008). Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practiceâ€, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.

Daryanto, Arief. (2004). Penguatan Kelembagaan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat sebagai Modal Sosial Pembangunan. Agrimedia, 9(1), 24-31.

Halibas, A. S., Sibayan, R. O., & Maata, R. L. R. (2017). The penta helix model of innovation in Oman: An HEI perspective. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 12, 159-172.

Kader, Mukhtar Abdul. (2018). Peran UKM dan Koperasi dalam Mewujudkan Ekonomi Kerakyatan Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Bisnis dan Manajemen, 8(1), 1-16.

Syahyuti. Alternatif Konsep Kelembagaan untuk Penajaman Operasionalisasi dalam Penelitian Sosiologi. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 21(2), 113-127.

Akbar, R. Jihad dan Prasetya, M. Yudha. RI Punya Banyak Program Pemberdayaan UMKM, Tapi Tumpang Tindih. Diambil Januari 28, 2023. Dari https://www.viva.co.id/berita/bisnis/1430330-ri-punya-banyak-program-pemberdayaan-umkm-tapi-tumpang-tindih?page=all.

Kompas.com. UMKM Pilih Marketplace selama Pandemi, Ini Alasannya. Diambil Agustus 25, 2022. Dari https://money.kompas.com/read/2021/05/03/203116326/umkm-pilih-market-place-selama-pandemi-ini-alasannya.

Mahdi, M. Ivan. Berapa Jumlah UMKM di Indonesia?. Diambil November 12, 2022. Dari https://dataindonesia.id/sektor-riil/detail/berapa-jumlah-umkm-di-indonesia.

Oorange Unpad. Profil Oorange Unpad. Diambil Mei 6, 2023. Dari https://pib.unpad.ac.id/profile-oorange-2023/.

Shopee. Kampus UMKM Shopee. Diambil Februari 21, 2023. Dari https://seller.shopee.co.id/edu/article/18111#:~:text=Keuntungan%20Bergabung%20dalam%20Kampus%20UMKM%20Shopee&text=Mendapatkan%20pendamping%20bisnis%20secara%20langsung,%2C%20seperti%20foto%2Flivestream%20studio.

Sukarno, Puput Ady. Ada Pandemi, Jumlah Transaksi dan Pelaku UMKM di E-Commerce Melesat. Diambil Februari 21, 2023. Dari Ada Pandemi, Jumlah Transaksi dan Pelaku UMKM di e-commerce Melesat (bisnis.com).

Sumba, Sabana. Kelembagaan dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Desa. Diambil Februari 23, 2023. Dari https://repository.uksw.edu/bitstream/123456789/7056/2/T2_902010002_BAB%20II.pdf.

Tokopedia. CSR. Diambil Februari 21, 2023. Dari https://www.tokopedia.com/about/impact/.

Published

2024-04-03

How to Cite

Elvetta, S., Murwadji, T., & Mulyati, E. (2024). Konsep Pentahelix Pada Pemberdayaan Usaha Mikro dan Kecil. Widya Yuridika, 7(1), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v7i1.4759