No Viral No Justice Perspektif Teori Efektivitas Hukum Soerjono Soekanto

Abstract

The phenomenon of "no viral no justice" is a new media culture that produces a form of social control innate in the era of information disclosure as a form of criticism of the authorities. The public has the view that a criminal report is difficult to immediately get a follow-up if it is not viral first. The participation of the millennial community towards the phenomenon of "no viral no justice" needs to be examined from the perspective of the effectiveness of Soerjono Soekanto's law. The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze millennial community participation in the phenomenon of "no viral no justice" from the perspective of Soerjono Soekanto's legal effectiveness theory. The research method used is this research using a qualitative approach with the type of empirical juridical research (field). The results of this study show that the response of the millennial community to the phenomenon of "no viral no justice" is divided into two types. First, millennials who respond to legal cases with features that have been provided on social media platforms. The second response is millennials who do not use application features in responding to legal cases that are widely discussed on social media but still respond outside social media in the form of chats and small discussions carried out in their daily lives. Millennials in their participation in the phenomenon of no viral no justice show that they have awareness if there are rights violated, awareness of legal remedies to protect interests, and the ability or power to take advantage of legal efforts to show. However, millennial community participation in the phenomenon of no viral no justice in terms of experience being a member of an organization that fights for interests. And not having bad experiences in the process of interaction with various elements of the formal legal circle has not been carried out optimally.