Rechtsvacuum Phenomenon Military Administrative Court Arrangements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v7i3.5429Keywords:
Rechtsvacuum, Justice, Military AdministrationAbstract
This article aims to deconstruct a comprehensive analysis to answer the problem of rechtvacuum in the military administrative justice system. Historically, military administrative court judges have rejected challenges to military administrative decisions on the grounds that there are no implementing regulations from the military justice law. Even the state administrative court also rejected the lawsuit of the military administrative decision because it was not his competence. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach, with descriptive analytical techniques. Based on the results of the analysis, it can be said that the consequences of the rechtvacuum of the military administrative court create legal uncertainty and human rights are ignored and as if members of the army are immune to the law. Then a judge is not allowed to reject a case on the basis that there is no punishment.References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Hamid S, A. (2021). Fungsi Ilmu Perundang-Undangan dalam pembentukan hukum nasional. In Maria Farida Indrati, Kumpulan Tulisan A Hamid S Attamimi; Gesetzgebungswissenschaft sebagai Salah Satu Upaya Menanggulangi Hutan Belantara Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Jakarta: Badan Penerbit Fakultas Hukum UI.
Agustina, E. (2016). Prospeksi Peradilan Tata Usaha Militer dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 16(Edisi Khusus), 180–194. Retrieved from https://journal.uii.ac.id/IUSTUM/article/view/3873
Ani Purwati. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum Teori dan Praktek (Tika Lestari, Ed.). Surabaya: Jakad Media Publishing.
Burhan Bungin. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Aktualisasi Metodologi ke Arah Ragam Varian Kontemporer. Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Harahap, Z. (2005). Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo.
Hosein, Z. A. (2016). Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia: Sejarah Kedudukan, Fungsi dan Pelaksanaan Kekuasan Kehakiman dalam Perspektif Konstitusi. Malang: Setara Press.
Hsb, A. M. (2017). Kegentingan Yang Memaksa Dalam Pembentukan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Compelling Circumstances Of The Enactment Government Regulation in Lieu Of Law). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 14(1), 109–122. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v14i1.71
Ihsan, M. (2021). Kedudukan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia dalam Proses Penunututan Peradilan Militer di Indonesia. Jurnal Intelektualita: Keislaman, Sosial, Dan Sains, 10(2), 283–292. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.19.109/intelektualitas.v10i2.8907
Khalid, A. (2014). Penafsiran Hukum Oleh Hakim Dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia. Jurnal Al’Adl, 6(11), 9–36. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v6i11.196
Kontras. (2022a). PTUN dan Peradilan Militer Menolak Gugatan Perlawanan Pengangkatan Pangdam Jaya: Bukti TNI Kebal Hukum di Negara Hukum. Retrieved August 18, 2023, from Kontras.org website: https://kontras.org/2022/04/20/ptun-dan-peradilan-militer-menolak-gugatan-atas-pengangkatan-penculik-jadi-pangdam-jaya-bukti-tni-kebal-hukum/
Kontras. (2022b). PTUN Menolak Gugatan Perlawanan Pengangkatan Pangdam Jaya: Bukti TNI Kebal Hukum di Negara Hukum. Retrieved August 18, 2023, from Kontras.org website: https://kontras.org/2022/06/17/ptun-menolak-gugatan-perlawanan-pengangkatan-pangdam-jaya-bukti-tni-kebal-hukum-di-negara-hukum/
Mahanani, A. E. E. (2021). Pemetaan Normatif Logika Pengecualian Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum: Widya Pranata Hukum, 3(1), 76–89. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v3i1.267
Manan, B. (2007). Menjadi Hakim Yang Baik. Jakarta: Mahkamah Agung RI.
Markus Suryoutomo & Mahmuda Pancawisma Febriharini. (2020). Penemuan Hukum (Rechtvinding) Hakim Dalam Perkara Perdata Sebagai Aspek Mengisi Kekosongan Hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 18(1), 103–116. Retrieved from https://jurnal.untagsmg.ac.id/indeks.php/hdm
Mertokusumo, Sudikno dan Pitlo, A. (1993). Bab tentang penemuan hukum. Jakarta: Citra Aditnya Bakti.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Sudaryono, A. (2012). Tugas dan Peran Hakim Dalam melakukan penemuan hukum/Rechtvinding (LC. Penafsiran konstitusi sebagai metode penemuan hukum). Jurnal Konstitusi, 1(1), 51–68. Retrieved from https://www.neliti.com/publications/115478/tugas-dan-peran-hakim-dalam-melakukan-penemuan-hukumrechtvinding-ic-penafsiran-k
Trubus Rahardian dan Endar Pulungan. (2007). Pengantar Sosiologi. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti.
Yulia. (2018). Hukum Acara Perdata. Lhoksumawe: Unimal Press.
Yusrizal. (2015). Modul Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Lhoksumawe: Unimal Press.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.
