Penanganan Petty Corruption Dengan Denda Damai Sebagai Bentuk Keadilan Restoratif
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v8i1.5974Keywords:
Amicable Fine, Petty Corruption, Restorative JusticeAbstract
This paper aims to discuss the legal issue of the application of peace fines in an effort to deal with petty corruption. This issue was born out of the issuance of Circular Letter of the Deputy Special Crimes Prosecutor Number: B-113/F/Fd. 1/05/2010 on Prioritization of Achievements in Handling Corruption Cases, which instructs agencies to prioritize corruption crimes with large losses and to discontinue corruption cases with small amounts, only by returning losses. Petty Corruption is a corrupt practice that refers to a relatively small amount of money and is carried out in the bureaucratic process of small public officials. So that if petty corruption is subject to the applicable positive law, it will cause injustice. This paper aims to provide a concept analysis of the application of peaceful fines in handling petty corruption that prioritizes restorative justice, guarantees justice, benefits and legal certainty and fulfills the principle of proportionality. The legal research conducted is normative juridical research with a conceptual approach and a statutory approach. The result of this research is that the mechanism of peaceful fines in handling petty corruption is a solution to the problems that arise. The application of peaceful fines to the handling of petty corruption provides a new breakthrough in law enforcement in the crime of corruption. With the application of peaceful fines, the sanctions given are in accordance with the principle of proportionality so that justice, benefit and legal certainty are fully fulfilled and prioritize restorative justice.References
BUKU
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Purwoleksono, D. E. (2016). Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.
Terracino, J. B. (2012). The International Legal Framework aginst Corruption State’s Obligations to Prevent and Repress Corruption. Cambridge: Intersentia Publishing Ltd.
Waluyo, B. (2016). Desain Fungsi Kejaksaan Pada Restorative Justice. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia.
Surat Edaran Jaksa Muda Pidana Khusus Nomor : B-113/F/Fd. 1/05/2010 tentang Prioritas Pencapaian Dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
ARTIKEL JURNAL
Ahli, Mahrus. (2018). Proporsionalitas dalam Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(1), 137-158. doi:https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol25.iss1.art7
Hestaria, Helena, Hartono, M. S dan Setianto, M. J. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Prinsip Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Rangka Penyelamatan Keuangan Negara. e-Journal Komunikasi Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, 5(3), 112-122. doi:https://doi.org/10.23887/jatayu.v5i3.51892
Hikmah, Hikmah dan Supoyono, Eko. (2019). Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berbasis Nilai Keadilan. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 78-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v1i1.78-92
Ifrani. (2017). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa. Al-Adl Jurnal, 9(3), 319-336. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v9i3.1047
Jackson, V. C. (2015). Constitutional Law in an Age of Proportionality. Yale Law Journal, 124(8), 3094-3196. https://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/h.3094.Jackson.3196_fteiok9v.pdf
Mahmud, Ade. (2020). Urgensi Penegakan Hukum Progresif Untuk Mengembalikan Kerugian Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(3), 256-271. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.3.2020.256-271
Salsabila dan Wahyudi, S. T. (2022). Peran Kejaksaan Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menggunakan Pendekatan Restorative Justice. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 51(1), 61-70. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/mmh.51.1.2022.61-70
Sari, N. M. dan Budiana, I. N. (2020). Limitatif Kewenangan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum, 8(9), 1324-1331. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2020.v08.i09.p03
Muchlis, Ahmad. (2016). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dengan Kerugian Negara Yang Kecil Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan. Fiat Justisia Journal of Law, 10(2), 341-370. doi:https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no2.652
Narindrani, Fuzi. (2020). Penyelesaian Korupsi Dengan Menggunakan Restoratif Justice (Corruption Settlement Using Justice Restoratives). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 605-617. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.605-617
Noviyanti, R, Danil, E dan Yoserwan. (2019). Penerapan Perma Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 3(1), 1-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v3i1.236
Santoso, H. A. (2021). Perspektif Keadilan Hukum Teori Gustav Radbruch Dalam Putusan PKPU. Jatiswara, 36(3), 325-334. doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v36i3.341
Suhariyanto, Budi. (2016). Restorative Justice dalam Pemidanaan Korporasi Pelaku Korupsi demi Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara. Jurnal Rechts VInding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 5(3), 421-438. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v5i3.153
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nicholas Gerard Felix Simeone, Mardian Putra Frans
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.
