Perbandingan Kode Etik Hakim Konstitusi Antara Indonesia Dan Jerman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v8i1.6052Keywords:
Comparative Law, Code of Ethics, Constitutional Court JudgesAbstract
The research studied by the author aims to understand and compare the regulation of the code of ethics of Indonesian and German constitutional judges and explain the regulation of the code of ethics of German judges stipulated in the BDG. The author conducts this research in a normative manner that analyzes norms in legislation using a comparative approach and statute approach. Indonesia and Germany have similar legal systems and similar historical backgrounds where both countries have experienced authoritarian regimes, so the Constitutional Court is present to prevent this from reappearing. The results showed that the Constitutional Court Regulation related to the code of ethics for constitutional judges refers to The Bangalore Principles 2002. The Constitutional Court Regulation itself has the same position as the Presidential Regulation "conditionally". The legal literature of PMK actually has the nature of internal regelingen, which means that the character of PMK is only binding on an institution. Germany does not regulate in detail in a regulation as found in Indonesia. Germany regulates the code of ethics in the Bundesdisziplinargesetz - BDG which is a law in federal disciplinary matters that applies mutatis mutandis with the Deutsches Richtergesetz - DRiG. The conclusion from the results of the research that has been reviewed by the author is that Indonesian legal policies that can report are not only internal to the Constitutional Court but the public can also report, while Germany which is regulated in the Law only applies to civil servants, especially constitutional judges.References
Ackerman, B. (2019). Revolutionary Constitutions : Charismatic Leadership and the Rule of Law (1st ed.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Arief, B. N. (2014). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana. Rajawali Pers.
Atmoko, D. (2022). Teori - Teori Hukum (1st ed.). CV. Literasi Nusantara Abadi.
Budiardjo, M. (2005). Dasar Dasar Ilmu Politik. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Calabresi, S. G. (2021). The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 2: The G-20 Civil Law Countries. In The History and Growth of Judicial Review, Volume 2: The G-20 Civil Law Countries (2nd ed., Vol. 4, Issue 1). Oxford University Press.
Collings, J. (2015). Democracy’s Guardians A History of the German Federal Constitutional Court 1951–2001 (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Donald P. Kommers, R. A. M. (2012). The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany (3rd ed.). Duke University Press.
Horowitz, D. L. (2013). Constitutional Change and Democracy in Indonesia (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Hosen, N. (2014). Promoting democracy and finding the right direction: A review of major constitutional developments in Indonesia. In Constitutionalism in Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century (1st ed., pp. 322–342). Cambridge University Press.
Huda, N. (2008). UUD 1945 dan Gagasan Amandemen Ulang. Rajawali Pers.
Ingeborg Franke, H.-D. W. (2024). Beamtenrecht des Bundes und der Länder, Richterrecht und Wehrrecht. C.H. Beck.
Isharyanto, & Abdurrachman, A. (2016). Penafsiran Hukum Hakim Konstitusi; (Studi terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 2004 tentang Sumber Daya Air). Halaman Moeka Publishing.
Jansen, N. (2006). Comparative Law and Comparative Knowledge. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (1st ed., p. 306). Oxford University Press.
Kelsen, H. (1949). General Theory of Law and State (20th ed.). Harvard University Press.
Kitchen, M. (2012). A History of Modern Germany: 1800 to the Present (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Marwiyah, S. (2015). Penegakan kode etik profesi di Era Malapraktik Profesi Hukum (1st ed.). UTM Press.
Matthias Bischoff, dkk. (2018). Fakta Mengenai Jerman (L. Hermanto (ed.)). FAZIT Communication GmbH.
Nadiroh. (2011). Konstitusi UUD 45. Universitas Terbuka.
Nurdin, B. (2012). Kedudukan dan Fungsi Hakim dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. PT Alumni.
O. F. Robinson, T. D. Fergus, W. M. G. (2000). European Legal History (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ralf Michaels. (2019). The Functional Method of Comparative Law. In M. ; Reimann (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law (pp. 339–382). Oxford University Press.
Riwanto, A. (2016). Sejarah Hukum: Konsep, Teori dan Metodenya dalam Pengembangan Ilmu Hukum. Oase Pustaka.
Rosenfeld, Michel & Sajó, A. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law. (Issue March 2016).
S, Maria. Farida. I. (2016). Ilmu Perundang-undangan 1 Jenis, Fungsi dan Materi Muatan. Kanisius.
Saskia K. Nagel, Michael Nagenborg, W. R. (2015). Ethics Assessment in Different Countries (Issue June).
Simon Butt, T. L. (2012). The Constitution of Indonesia: A Contextual Analysis (1st ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Soekanto, S. (1979). Perbandingan Hukum. Alumni.
Soimin. (2013). Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia (Muntoha (ed.)). UII Press Yogyakarta.
Stock, von U. (1932). Entwicklung und Wesen der Amtsverbrechen. T. Weicher.
Wartiningsih, Indien Winarwati, R. Y. (2019). Buku Ajar Perbandingan Hukum (D. Rahayu (ed.)). Scopindo Media Pustaka.
Weber, R. (2020). Law-making Activity of the German Federal Constitutional Court: A case-law study. In M. Florczak-Wator (Ed.), Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts (1st ed., p. 279). Routledge.
Wheare, K. C. (2008). Konstitusi-Kontitusi Modern (Terjemahan). Nusa Media.
White, H. (2014). Metahistory : The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (M. S. Roth (ed.); 40th ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Youngs, R. (2014). English, French & German Comparative Law (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Undang-Undang
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945
Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Deutsches Richtergesetz – DRiG
Bundesdisziplinargesetz – BDG
Undang-Undang Nomor 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi Lembaran Negara Tahun 2003 Nomor 98, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 4316.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman, Lembaran Negara Tahun 2009 Nomor 157, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5076.
Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 82, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5234.
Jurnal
Adam Ilyas, D. E. P. (2022). Problematika Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Berbagai Implikasinya. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1943
Adonara, F. F. (2016). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(2), 217. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1222
Ali, M. I. (2020). Comparative Legal Research-Building a Legal Attitude for a Transnational World. Journal of Legal Studies, 26(40), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.2478/jles-2020-0012
Christian, E., Siagian, F., S ulaksana, H., Zaky, M., Antonio, K., Rachmawati, D. A., & Sumardi, S. (2021). Sejarah Sistem Hukum Eropa Kontinental (Civil Law) Dan Implementasinya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Specialis, 1(1), 43–47.
Fallon, R. H. (1999). How to Choose a Constitutional Theory. California Law Review, 87(3), 535. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481027
Law, D. S. (2009). A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review. Georgetown Law Journal, 97, 79. https://doi.org/https://ssrn.com/abstract=1112613
Mardiya, N. Q. (2017). Pengawasan Perilaku Hakim Konstitusi oleh Dewan Etik. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 6(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.1.2017.25-40
Partner, N. (2023). What, At Long Last, Is Historical Theory for? Reflections on Historical Theory in a Post-Truth World. History and Theory, 62(2), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12302
Patterson, E. W. (1951). Historical and Evolutionary Theories of Law. Columbia Law Review, 51(6), 681–709. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1119252
Pratama, J. P., Tyesta ALW, L., & Gading Pinilih, S. A. (2022). Eksistensi Kedudukan Peraturan Menteri terhadap Peraturan Daerah dalam Hierarki Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1947
Ramadan, W. A., Nusantara, I. A. P., & Mitasari, T. (2022). Reformulasi Pengawasan Mahkamah Konstitusi Demi Meningkatkan Efektivitas Penegakan Kode Etik Hakim Konstitusi. Jurnal Studia Legalia, 3(02), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.61084/jsl.v3i02.29
Rogall, K. (2003). Principles of criminal procedure and their application in disciplinary proceedings. Revue Internationale de Droit Penal, 74(3–4), 925–958. https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.743.0925
Schorling, F. (2022). A Deeper History of German Law. SSRN Electronic Journal, 106(1900), 13. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4154541
Strauss, D. A. (1999). What Is Constitutional Theory? California Law Review, 87(3), 581. https://doi.org/10.2307/3481028
Subiyanto, A. E. (2016). Mendesain Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945. Jurnal Konstitusi, 9(4), 661. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk944
Suparman, O. (2023). Konsep Lembaga Negara Indonesia dalam Perspektif Teori Trias Politica Berdasarkan Prinsip Checks and Balances System. Ahkam, 2(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.58578/ahkam.v2i1.898
Suzeeta, N. S., & Lewoleba, K. K. (2023). Pelanggaran Kode Etik oleh Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 90/Puu-Xxi/2023. Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(11), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10252190
The Judicial Integrity Group. (2007). Commentary on the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct. March, 153. http://www.unodc.org/documents/corruption/publications_unodc_commentary-e.pdf
Wendel, L., Shadrova, A., & Tischbirek, A. (2022). From Modeled Topics to Areas of Law: A Comparative Analysis of Types of Proceedings in the German Federal Constitutional Court. German Law Journal, 23(4), 493–531. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.39
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Riyan Wahyuda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
AttributionYou must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Widya Yuridika: Journal of Law.
Faculty of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.
