Kedudukan Aset Milik Pihak Ketiga Yang Dijadikan Sebagai Boedel Pailit Oleh Kurator Berdasarkan UU Kepailitan Dan UU Hak Tanggungan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v6i2.4080Keywords:
Mortgage, Bankruptcy, Third Party AssetsAbstract
Mortgage is one type of guarantee that lenders are interested in offering loan facilities for because it is seen as a good guarantee and simple to implement. In reality, the guarantee granted by the Debtor to the Creditor bound by this Mortgage does not always belong to the Debtor but rather to a Third Party who has hand over their assets as guarantee for the payment of the Debtor's obligation. Of course, this only becomes a problem if the debtor is unable to repay the creditor; in that case, the creditor may decide to use the bankruptcy process as the last resort to address the debt issue. There are frequently issues with the Curator's power to add all assets connected to the Debtor's assets, including Third Party assets pledged as collateral, to the bankrupt estate. With reference to the Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy (K-PKPU Law)  and Law Number 4 of 1996 on Mortgage, this study intends to perform a deeper analysis relating to the authority of the Curator as well as the situation of assets belonging to Third Parties bound by Mortgage in the bankruptcy case. This study was put together using a qualitative method and a normative juridical approach. Data were collected online through a literature review, and they were processed in an analytical descriptive way. The findings of this study show that, first, the new Curator has the ability to enter  Third Party assets if, after two (two) months, Separatist Creditors have not exercised their right to execution as provided for in Article 59, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the K-PKPU Law. Second, under Article 59(1) of the K-PKPU Law, which refers to the principle of lex posteriori derogat legi priori and views the context of the case as bankruptcy, the Curator is actually given the authority to conduct auctions due to the position of assets belonging to Third Parties in the bankruptcy estate, then to resolve this case related to the position of Third Party assets in the bankruptcy estate refers to the K-PKPU Law.References
Buku
M. Bahsan. (2007). Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Jakrta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Man S. (2019). Satrawidjaya. Hukum Kepailitan : Analisis Jaminan Peroangan (Personal Guarantor) dalam Perkara Kepailitan. Bandung: Keni Media.
Sutan Remi Sjahdeni. (2018). Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan : Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.
Suharnoko.(2015). Hukum Perjanjian Teori Analisa dan Kasus. Jakarta: Kencana.
S. Mantayborbir. (2004). Aneka Hukum Perjanjian Sekitar Pengurusan Piutang Negara. Jakarta: Pustaka Bangsa Press.
Artikel Jurnal
Bank Indonesia. (2021). Survei Permintaan dan Penawaran Pembiayaan Perbankan Agustus 2021 : Penyaluran Pembiayaan Perbankan Terindikasi Meningkat.( https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/ruang-media/news-release/Pages/sp_2323821.aspx)
International Monetary Fund. (2021). Credit Expansion in Emerging Markets; Propeller of Growth?. (https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2015/wp15212.pdf)
Peraturan perundang-undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda Yang Berkaitan Dengan Tanah
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Attribution: you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Legal Spirit allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Legal Spirit Journal.
Postgraduate Master of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.