Prinsip Itikad Baik Terhadap Merek MS Glow

Authors

  • Taslim Abd. Rachman Universitas Khairun
  • Rusdin Alauddin Universitas Khairun
  • Sultan Alwan Universitas Khairun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5091

Keywords:

Legal Protection, Good Faith, MS Glow Trademark, PS Glow Trademark.

Abstract

Legal protection is an important aspect that needs to be considered in the controversy between MS Glow and PS Glow trademarks. PT Kosmetika Global Indonesia, the MS Glow brand holder that has registered its brand with the Director General of Intellectual Property Rights, requires adequate legal protection. The public sees that the products of the MS Glow brand are better known than the products of the PS Glow brand, and there is a view that PS Glow is trying to hijack the popularity of MS Glow. Through normative juridical legal research, it was found that in the context of the principle of good faith, MS Glow is entitled to legal protection as a brand owner. The brand owner has the exclusive right to the use of its brand and the government is responsible for ensuring this protection. The judge's decision in the dispute between the MS Glow and PS Glow trademarks (Decision Number 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.Sby) has fulfilled the principle of legal certainty. The judge refers to Law Number 20 Year 2016 on Trademark Registration and Geographical Indications as well as the principle of "first to file". However, the decision has not fully reflected justice and expediency. In the context of trademark registration, the "first to file" principle needs to be evaluated by the government to make it fairer. The lengthy trademark registration process must pay close attention to every detail, the Director General of IPR must be more active in socializing Law Number 20 Year 2016, including the principle of "first to file" to the public so that understanding of the trademark and the registration process becomes better.

References

Abdillah, M. A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Merek Tidak Terdaftar Atas Tindakan Pendaftaran Mereknya oleh Pihak Lain Ditinjau dari Asas Itikad Baik. Jurist-Diction Law Journal, 2(4), 1357-1354.

Arifardhani, Y., & Prabowo, B. A. (2020). Hukum Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Kencana.

Cansil, C.S.T. (1997). Hak Milik Intelektual (Hak Milik Perindustrian dan Hak Cipta). Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika.

Dewi, C. G. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelanggaran Merek. Yogyakarta: Budi Utama.

Djumhana, M., & Djubaedillah, R. (2014). Hak Milik Intelektual (Sejarah, Teori, dan Praktiknya di Indonesia). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Djumhana, M., & Djubaedillah, R. (2013). Hak Milik Intelektual Sejarah Teori dan Prakteknya di Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Iftitah, Anik, ed. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mei 2023. Sada Kurnia Pustaka, 2023.

Istiqmalia, M. N., Nurfauziah, M., & Joesoef, I. E. (2021). Itikad Baik dalam Pendaftaran Merek: Studi Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Merek Terkenal di Indonesia. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 406-426.

Janed, R. (2015). Hukum Merek Trademark Law. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.

Kaligis, O.C. (2008). Teori & Praktik Hukum Merek Indonesia. Bandung: Alumni.

Kadarudin. (2021). Penelitian di Bidang Ilmu Hukum (Sebuah Pemahaman Awal). Semarang: Formaci.

Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya.

Mulyati, R. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Merek Terkenal untuk Barang dan/atau Jasa Tidak Sejenis dalam Hukum Merek Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana.

Purwaka, T. H. (2018). Perlindungan Merek. Jakarta: Yayasan Pusat Obor Indonesia.

Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Medan 2/Pdt.Sus-HKI/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Mdn.

Putusan Nomor 2/Pdt.Sus.HKI/Merek/2022/PN.Niaga.Sby.

Ramadhan, F., & Lukman, A. (2021). Pembatalan Akta Wasiat yang Dibuat Notaris Berdasarkan Alat Bukti Resume Rapat Keluarga (Analisis Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1968 K/PDT/2018). Imanot: Jurnal Kemahasiswaan Hukum & Kenotariatan, 1(1), 118-141.

Saidin. (1997). Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Right). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudja, S. (2001). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Sukalandari, N. W., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Wesna, P. A. S. (2023). Sengketa Plagiasi Merek Dagang antara Ms Glow dan Ps Glow. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 5(1), 52.

Suardita, I. K. (2017). Pengenalan Bahan Hukum (PBH). Bali: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana.

Susanti, D. O., & Efendi, A. (2013). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Rachman, T. A., Alauddin, R., & Alwan, S. (2024). Prinsip Itikad Baik Terhadap Merek MS Glow. Legal Spirit, 8(1), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5091