Implementation of Plea Bargaining in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System

Authors

  • Desi Nurana Univesitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5195

Keywords:

Criminal Justice System, Implementation, Plea Bargaining

Abstract

There is a need for a new system in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System that is thought to make case handling more efficient, specifically by adopting plea bargaining as a problem-solving method for the Indonesian criminal justice system. In this study, the issue formulation is how to implement plea bargaining in the present criminal justice system and the urgency of plea bargaining in the renewal of the Indonesian criminal justice system. The Normative Juridical Research technique was employed to generate this research. Normative Juridical Research is a type of legal research that involves literature study or just secondary information. The regulation on the application of Plea Bargaining in the current criminal justice system is not based on the value of justice, as Article 4 paragraph (2) of Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power mandates that the judicial process must be carried out quickly. At a low cost, but based on the problems that the author described in the previous sub-chapter, the criminal justice process has not been able to reach a simple judicature to this day. The complexity of the criminal justice process in Indonesia now prevents simple, quick, and low-cost judicial implementation from being accomplished in the criminal justice process in Indonesia. In this case, there is a need for a renovation of Indonesia's criminal justice system. This is the legal basis for the urgent need to establish Plea Bargaining in Indonesia.

References

Ansori, L. (2018). REFORMASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM PROGRESIF. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i2.244

Atmasasmita, R. (2010). Sistem peradilan pidana kontemporer. Kencana.

Bagaskoro, L. (2021). REKONSEPTUALISASI JALUR KHUSUS DALAM RANCANGAN KUHAP SEBAGAI BENTUK REFORMASI SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA INDONESIA. Arena Hukum, 14(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01401.10

Farida, A. (2016). TEORI HUKUM PANCASILA SEBAGAI SINTESA KONVERGENSI TEORI-TEORI HUKUM DI INDONESIA. Perspektif, 21(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.30742/perspektif.v21i1.176

Fratama, R. A. (2021). JALUR KHUSUS (PLEA BARGAINING) DALAM HUKUM ACARA PIDANA. Badamai Law Journal, 5(2), 230. https://doi.org/10.32801/damai.v5i2.10755

Hartono, S. (2015). Analisa dan Evaluasi Peraturan Perundang-undangan Peninggalan Kolonial Belanda. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.

Iswara, I. M. A. M. (2017). Penguatan Kejaksaan dalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana melalui Plea Barganing. Jurnal Advokasi, 7(1), 24–37.

Koswara, P., & Megawati. (2023). Analisis Prinsip Independensi Hakim Konstitusi di Indonesia. 3(1).

Mardiana, I. (2015). MANAJEMEN PENYIDIKAN ANTARA PENYIDIK POLRI KE JAKSA PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PENYELESAIAN BERKAS PERKARA. Aplikasi Administrasi: Media Analisa Masalah Administrasi, 18(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.30649/aamama.v18i2.34

Mulingka, F. A. (2015). FUNGSI DAN KEDUDUKAN HAKIM DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANAN KAITANNYA DENGAN KEMANDIRIAN HAKIM. Lex Adminitratum, 3(6), 34–42.

Nelson, F. M. (2020). DUE PROCESS MODEL DAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DI INDONESIA: SUATU TELAAH KONSEPTUAL. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, 1(1), 92–112. https://doi.org/10.51370/jhpk.v1i1.5

Nixson, N., Kalo, S., Kamello, T., & Mulyadi, M. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Whistleblower dan Justice Collaborator dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. USU Law Journal, 2(2), 40–56.

Ruchoyah, R. (2020). Urgensi Plea Bargaining System Dalam Pembaruan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia: Studi Perbandingan Plea Bargaining System Di Amerika Serikat. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art9

Saleh, P. A. (2013). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM YANG MENGABAIKAN BUKTI KETERANGAN SAKSI DI DALAM PERSIDANGAN. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v1i1.1313

Suhariyanto, B. (2015). EKSISTENSI PEMBENTUKAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM DALAM DINAMIKA POLITIK LEGISLASI DI INDONESIA. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 4(3), 413–430. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v4i3.14

Suheri, A. (2018). WUJUD KEADILAN DALAM MASYARAKAT DI TINJAU DARI PERSPEKTIF HUKUM NASIONAL. Jurnal Morality, 4(1), 60–68.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-05

How to Cite

Nurana, D. (2024). Implementation of Plea Bargaining in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. Legal Spirit, 8(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i1.5195

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Law and Society

Section

Articles

License

Attribution: you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

Legal Spirit allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions

  • Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
  • Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal

========================================
Editor-in-Chief

Legal Spirit Journal.
Postgraduate Master of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.