Valuasi Kekayaan Intelektual: Penerapan Asas Going Concern Boedel Pailit

Authors

  • Riss Daniel Mikhael Pasaribu Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i3.5537

Keywords:

Intelectual Property, Bankcruptcy Estate, Asset Valuation, Going Concern

Abstract

The concept of Intelectual Property Being Used as a Bankcruptcy Estate is an Anomaly in itself in Indonesia. In terms of Intelectual Property, It is not a commonly used kind of wealth as bankcruptcy estate in Indonesia. Basically because of its unstability in Price, or because of the difficulty to determine the valuation of the Intelectual Property itself. This article in particular, wishes to hopefully helps to learn more about the usage of Intelectual Property ini such cases. The article aims to know, how the process of valuation is managed, the methods and the weigh point on how valuable is on Intelectual Property. The differences of many standards on how to define the valuation of an Intelectual Property makes it even harder to determine which appraisement should be used on these kinds of cases, the availability of authorities such as KJPP, also contributes a lot for the progress of valuatin an asset itself. In terms of Bankcruptcy, in Indonesia there is one principle that is commonly used, The Going Concern Principle, which is a principle that lets a company keeps on running In the brink of bankcruptcy with the hope that it would maintain and gain even more fortune In the future. This research uses a normative legal methods, from data from literature and legal documentation. The results in this study is that, there is 3 definite ways to define the valuation of an intellectual property, which is based on certain things that goes around in the market. 

References

BUKU

Ali, Zainuddin. “Metode Penelitian Hukumâ€. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika, 2021, Hal. 11

ARTIKEL JURNAL

Faisal, Athariq. 2023. Brand Value: 3 Pendekatan Penghitungannya Dan Dampaknya Terhadap Bisnis, Artikel Bisnis Bank Hijra

Nainggolan, Bernard, “Pemberdayaan Hukum Hak Cipta dan Lembaga Manajemen Kolektifâ€, PT. Alumni, Bandung, 2011, Hlm. 151

Simalango, Maruli. 2017. Asas Kelangsungan Usaha (Going Concern) Dalam Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia. Journal Academia.edu, hlm. 60

Armia, Muhammad Siddiq, “Penentuan Metode & Pendekatan Penelitian Hukumâ€, Aceh : Lembaga Kajian Konstitusi Indonesia (LKKI), 2022, Hal. 7

Shubhan, M. Hadi, "The Utilization Of Unwritten Laws In Bankruptcy Disputes", Jurnal Rechtsvinding, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2019, Hal. 86

SIP Lawfirm. 2023. Going Concern Sebagai Upaya Kelangsungan Usaha Debitur Pailit, Artikel SIP Lawfirm

Sulaiman Syamsuddin, Ma’ruf Hafidz, dan Hama Baharuddin, “Perlindungan Hukum Pihak Ketiga Terhadap Jaminan Kebendaan Dalam Harta Pailitâ€, Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS), Vol.2, No. 3, 2021, Hal. 1373

Tua, Johnson Sahat Maruli. 2019. Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Harta Pailit dalam Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia, Jakarta: Jurnal Hukum To-Ra. Hlm. 104

WEBSITE

AKR. 2012. Penilaian Aset Tak Berwujud. Diambil pada 10 Februari 2023, dari https://www.kjpp-akr.co.id/penilaian-aset-tak-berwujud/

“Going Concern Valueâ€, https://law.jrank.org/pages/7169/Going-Concern-Value.html, diakses pada 10 Desember 2023.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Pasaribu, R. D. M. (2024). Valuasi Kekayaan Intelektual: Penerapan Asas Going Concern Boedel Pailit. Legal Spirit, 8(3), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i3.5537