The Concept Of Property In Online Sales Mystery Box In Indonesia

Authors

  • Maria Rosalind Airlangga University
  • Ellysia Septiana Airlangga University
  • Claudia Annabel Airlangga University
  • Indah Winarni Airlangga University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i3.6446

Keywords:

Mystery Box, Online Buying and Selling, Property Rights.

Abstract

The online buying and selling trend have become popular among various groups. Various items are sold online on marketplaces, and one of the items is the mystery box, where buyers purchase a secret box without knowing its contents. This research aims to identify the concept of property in the mystery box as an object of buying and selling transactions in Indonesian marketplaces, as well as the validity of the agreement from these transactions. This research is conducted using normative legal research methods with Statue Approach and Conceptual Approach. The results of this study indicate that the concept of property in the mystery box is relative because its contents cannot be predicted and there is an element of chance in every transaction. Therefore, the principle of individualiteit (individuality) regarding the object is not fulfilled because in property law, it is absolute for objects to be substantial and tangible to maintain its rights as stated in Article 499 of Burgerlijk Wetboek. The agreement for buying and selling mystery boxes also disregards the contra preferentum rule principle, due to the lack of information from the seller about the item that is being sold, thus it can lead to multiple interpretations and losses. 

References

Gozali, D. S. & Hafidah, N. (2020). Dasar-dasar Hukum Kebendaan Hak Kebendaan Memberi Kenikmatan & Jaminan. Yogyakarta : UII Press.

Isnaeni, M. (2016). Perjanjian Jual Beli. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama.

Isnaeni, M. (2020). Hukum Harta Kekayaan Episentrum Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW). Surabaya : Revka Prima Media.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta : Kencana.

Putro, W. D., Zuhairi, A., Salam, S. & Lubis, E. L. T. (2016). Penjelasan Hukum: Pembeli Beritikad Baik Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Beritikad Baik dalam Sengketa Perdata Obyek Tanah. Jakarta : LeIP.

Soebekti. (2005). Pokok-pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta : Intermasa.

Suteki & Taufani, G. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum, Filsafat, Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Journals and Proceeding

Afiq, M. A. & Imanullah, M. N. (2023). The Study of Consumer Protection in The Mystery Box Sale and Purchase Agreement on Shopee Marketplace Viewed from Indonesian Law. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 4(1), 89-93. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i1.585.

Akmala, S. (2019). Perkembangan Internet Pada Generasi Muda di Indonesia dengan Kaitan Undang-undang ITE yang Berlaku. Jurnal Cyber Security dan Forensik Digital, 1(2), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.14421/csecurity.2018.1.2.1371.

Amin, M., Akbar, M. I., Faizal, B. T. W. & Maghfiroh, R. A. (2023). The Legal Consequences of Mystery Box Purchase and Sale Transactions Based on The Disclosure Concept. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani, 10(2), 263-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v10i2.3007.

Basyarudin. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Akibat Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kontruksi yang Dilaksanakan Kontraktor. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah., 1(2), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.53625/jcijurnalcakrawalailmiah.v1i2.2778.

Intradewi, A. A. S. N. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembelian Mystery Box Ditinjau dari Undang-undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 12(2), 39-47. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i02.p04.

Irfana, M. R. & Witasari, A. (2021). The Mystery Box Transaction Practice in The Perspective of Islamic Law and Civil Law. Proceeding of International Conference on The Law Development for Public Welfare, 1(2), 152-158.

Long, R. J. & Avalon, A. (2016). The Doctrine of Unjust Enrichment. Long International, 303, 1-10.

Nugroho, M. & Astuti, F. Y. (2022). Jual Beli Mystery Box pada E-Commerse dalam Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Islam. Journal Economic Insights, 1(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.51792/jei.v1i2.38.

Ramadhanty, G. A. & Surahmad. (2021). Peralihan Hak Milik atas Barang melalui Jual Beli Online dengan Sistem Cash on Delivery. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, 10(2), 361-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v10i2.8060.

Sari, N. N., Kara, M. & Muin, R. (2021). Mystery Box and its Impact on Society (Islamic Law Review). International Journal of Islamic Study, 1(2), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.24252/ijis.v1i2.32436.

Soerodjo, I. (2016). The Development of Indonesian Civil Law. Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ), IV(IX), 30-35.

Sulistyo, A. Q. P., Irawan, A. D., A’dawiyah, T. M., Indriani, R. & Hidayat, M. N. (2023). Penerapan Asas Individualiteit terhadap Sistematika Berjalannya Hukum Kebendaan di Masyarakat Indonesia. Ahmad Dahlan Legal Perspective, 3(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.12928/adlp.v3i1.8005.

Widiyono, T. (2022). Objects and How to Get Them Based on Indonesian Law. International Journal of Engineering Business and Social Science, 1(2), 41- 48. https://doi.org/10.58451/ijebss.v1i02.6.

Yiao, L. X. (2022). Blind Boxes: Opening Our Eyes to The Challenging Regulation of Gambling-Like Products and Gamblification and Unexplained Regulatory Inaction. Gaming Law Review, 26(5), 255-268. https://doi.org/10.1089/glr2.2022.0012.

Internet

Dewi, I. R. 2021. Heboh Mystery Box di Marketplace, Bisnis Lottery Abal-abal yang Hasilnya Zonk. Retrieved on September 3th, from https://tekno.sindonews.com/read/530942/207/heboh-mystery-box-dimarketplace-bisnis-lottery-abal-abal-yang-hasilnya-zonk1630670991/10

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Rosalind, M., Septiana, E., Annabel, C., & Winarni, I. (2024). The Concept Of Property In Online Sales Mystery Box In Indonesia. Legal Spirit, 8(3), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i3.6446