Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan United Nation Convention Against Corruption Di Kawasan ASEAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v6i2.3849Keywords:
asset recovery, UNCAC, MLA, ASEANAbstract
The purpose of this study is to determine a model of international cooperation so that the assets recovery cross-border resulting from corruption in ASEAN can be more effective. Therefore, the questions in this study are: (1) how is the implementation of assets recovery cross-border as a result of corruption based on UNCAC in ASEAN including the obstacles faced and the success of assets recovery cross-border? (2) What is the solution for assets recovery cross-border resulting from corruption? This study using normative legal research methods with written studies using secondary data such as laws and regulations, legal theory, legal principles and scientific works of scholars (doctrine). The results of the study (1) The implementation of assets recovery cross-border resulting from Indonesian corruption in ASEAN was only successful for the first time in 2019 with a return of SGD 200,000 by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) in collaboration with the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) Singapore. Obstacles in the implementation of assets recovery cross-border resulting from corruption: a. Structured abuse of power, b. the principle of sovereignty, c. national interest of a country and d. the Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters (MLA ASEAN) as an international agreement is not sufficiently binding (soft law) and requires further processes such as ratification and adjustment to national criminal law. (2) Even though there is a legal umbrella for eradicating corruption related to the assets recovery cross-border resulting from corruption in the form of UNCAC and MLA ASEAN, in order to maximize the implementation of assets recovery cross-border in ASEAN, a special (bilateral) implementing agreement for assets recovery cross-border is needed in order to have more binding power. The implementation agreement is not enough, then it is also necessary to adjust and align the tools of Indonesian national law related to the asset recovery cross-border from corruption and the provision of appropriate authority for law enforcement.References
Ariawan, I. G. K. (2008). Stolen Asset Recovery Initiative, Suatu Harapan Dalam Pengembalian Aset Negara. Jurnal Kertha Patrika, 33(1).
Arifin, R. (2016). Analisis Hukum Internasional dalam Perampasan Aset di Negara Kawasan Asia Tenggara Berdasarkan United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) dan ASEAN Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (AMLAT). Jurnal Penelitian Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 3(1), 37-55.
Arifin, R., Utari, I. S., & Subondo, H. (2017). Upaya Pengembalian Aset Korupsi yang Berada di Luar Negeri (Asset Recovery) dalam Penegakan Hukum Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia. IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies), 1(1), 105-137.
ASEAN. (2020). ASEAN Aims. ASEAN. https://asean.org/what-we-do#fundamental-principles.
Binaji, S. H., & Hartanti. (2019). Korupsi Sebagai Extra Ordinary Crimes. Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 4(1), 157-174.
Daud, B. S., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2022). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang di Pasar Modal. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(1), 59-80.
Irianto, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Metodologi Penelitian Ilmu Hukum. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembagunan, 32(2), 155-172.
Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Mirra Buana Media.
Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. (2009). Tentang ASEAN. Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia. http://kemlu.go.id/portal/id/read/122/halaman_list_lainnya/about-asean
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. (2022). Resmi Ditandatangani, Inilah Lini Masa Perjanjian Ekstradisi Indonesia-Singapura. Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi. https://menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/berita-daerah/resmi-ditandatangani-inilah-lini-masa-perjanjian-ekstradisi-indonesia-singapura
Kennedy, R. (2017). Pengembalian Aset Hasil Kejahatan Dalam Perspektif Rezim Anti Pencucian Uang. Rajawali Pers.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2019). Laporan Tahunan KPK 2019.
Kusnadi, K. (2020). Kebijakan Formulasi Ketentuan Pengembalian Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Corruptio, 1(2), 105-116.
Kusumaatmadja, M., & Agoes, E. R. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Alumni.
Latukau, F. (2019). Pengadopsian UNCAC Mengenai Pengembalian Aset Hasil Korupsi Yang Dibawa Atau Disimpan Ke Luar Negeri Dalam Penegakan Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Belo, 5(1), 10-31.
Mahmud, A. (2018). Problematika Asset Recovery dalam Pengembalian Kerugian Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal Yudisial, 11(3), 347-366.
Miladmahesi, R. (2020). Dinamika Baru Dalam Pemulihan Aset Akibat Korupsi di Indonesia. Journal of Judicial Review, 22(1), 14-31.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs Singapore. (2022). Transcript of Ministerial Statement by Senior Minister and Coordinating Minister for National Security Teo Chee Hean on the Agreements Under the Expanded Framework Between Singapore and Indonesia at the Parliament Sitting on 14 February 2022. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Singapore. https://www.mfa.gov.sg/Newsroom/Press-Statements-Transcripts-and-Photos/2022/02/20220214-SM-Teo-Ministerial-Statement
Pakpahan, R. H., & Firdaus, A. (2019). Pembaharuan Kebijakan Hukum Asset Recovery: Antara Ius Constitutum dan Ius Constituendum. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 16(3), 369-378.
Panggabean, H. P. (2020). Pemulihan Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Teori - Praktik dan Yurisprudensi di Indonesia. Bhuana Ilmu Populer.
Parthiana, I. W. (2002). Hukum Perjanjian Internasional. Mandar Maju.
Pohan, S. (2020). Tinjauan Normatif Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Money Laundering) Yang Berasal Dari Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 7(2), 275-289.
Riyanto, S. (2014). Re-Interpretasi Kedaulatan Negara Dalam Hukum Internasional.
Sandoval, E. B., & Kornelis, Y. (2022). Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/PUU-XVII/2019: Hancurkan Independensi KPK?. Journal of Judicial Review, 24(1), 105-134.
Transparency International. (2021). Corruption Perceptions Index. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021/index/cod
Wahyuningrum, K. S., Disemadi, H. S., & Jaya, N. S. P. (2020). Independensi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi: Benarkah Ada?. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(2), 239-258.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Attribution: you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Legal Spirit allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Legal Spirit Journal.
Postgraduate Master of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.