Harmonisasi Hukum Penjatuhan Pada Pidana Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana Terhadap Justice Collaborator

Firdaus Rizky Utama; Eka Nanda Ravizki

doi:10.31328/ls.v9i1.5755

Authors

Firdaus Rizky Utama
Eka Nanda Ravizki

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v9i1.5755

Keywords:

Sentencing, Premeditated Murder, Justice Collaborator

Abstract

A Justice Collaborator is a perpetrator of a criminal act who cooperates with law enforcement authorities to later become a witness and provide testimony to help uncover specific criminal cases in exchange for a reduction in punishment, one of which involves premeditated murder as found in Verdict Number 798/Pid. B/2022/PN. Jkt. Sel. However, to become a Justice Collaborator, there are several conditions that need to be met. The aim of this research is to examine juridically the requirements for establishing a Justice Collaborator, as well as to analyze how the Judge's Consideration in Granting Leniency to Justice Collaborators in Verdict Number: 798/Pid. B./Jkt. Sel. The research method used in this study is the Normative Juridical method with a Conceptual Approach, Statutory Approach, and Case Approach. The results of this study show that in establishing a Justice Collaborator, several conditions must be met in accordance with the prevailing regulations, including Law No. 31 of 2014 and Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2011, and judges in granting leniency to Justice Collaborators use several considerations, one of which is because the defendant becomes a Justice Collaborator and is willing to testify in court, thus shedding light on the case which was previously shrouded in confusion and misunderstanding from various parties, threatening to distort the truth and justice. The defendant's courage, honesty, and perseverance in facing various obstacles to uncovering the truth make them worthy of recognition as a Justice Collaborator and deserving of leniency.

References

Buku

R Soesilo, (1988). Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana Serta Komentar-Komentarnya Lengkap dengan Pasal Demi Pasal. Politea.

Adami Chazawi. (2014). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian 3: Percobaan dan Penyertaan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Arief, B. N. (2002). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenanda Media Group

Arief, B. N. (2013). Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT Citra Adiya Bakti.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Tahun 1945

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan Atas Dasar Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perlakuan Bagi Pelapor Tindak Pidana (WhistleBlower) dan Saksi pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator)

Artikel Jurnal

Batavia Putri. (2019). Urgensi Pengaturan Justice Collaborator Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jom Fakultas Hukum Vol. VI, NO.2

Ratmoko, F. C., & Setyorini, E. H. (2023). Peran Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana. SOSIALITA, Vol. 2 No. (1).

Indra, M. & Sanjani, F. R. (2015). Penerapan Justice Collaborator Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, Vol.2, No. 2.

Faizah, H. (2020). Penerapan Pidana Terhadap Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Nomor: 30/Pid. Sus-Tpk/2019/Pn. Mtr).

Artikel Jurnal DOI

Farhan, Z. N., Guntara, D., Abas, M., & Dewi, S. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Dihubungkan Dengan Putusan Nomor 798/Pid. B/2022/Pn. Jkt. Sel. Rechtscientia: Jurnal Mahasiswa Hukum, Vol. 3, No.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36805/rechtscientia.v3i1.773

Prawitasari, N. Y. (2023). Penerapan Pidana Terhadap Justice Collaborator Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Putusan Nomor: 798/Pid. B/2022/PN. Jkt. Sel). Jurnal Hukum Pelita, Vol. 4 No. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37366/jh.v4i2.2916