Socioeconomic and legal analysis of court fees structure and payment system in Ethiopia: Towards a policy-oriented approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/jsed.v5i2.3745Keywords:
access to justice, cost recovery, Ethiopia, inflation, legal analysisAbstract
Court fees in Ethiopia are governed by the Court Fees Regulation Number 177/1945. Although many things have changed over the past 67 years, none of the consecutive governments attempted to revise the court fee system. The user charge on judicial litigation (court fees), is justified for the existence of negative externalities that each user (litigant) generates to society. This is generated by the existence of incomplete markets, where the private benefits of litigation differ from social benefits. The charge has to match both benefits (private and social) and reach a social optimal equilibrium. The argument is that when private litigation costs are less than the social costs, there will be an inefficiently high level of litigation. Methodologically, a total of 44 legal professionals who have most frequent contact with the court and individuals undergoing trial were interviewed for operational purposes of the study... Key finding revealed that most respondents identified a problem with the existing court fee structure and payment system including controversies with respect to specified and unspecified claims. The new court fee will fill the gap that applied since 1945. So it should be amended in some respects according to the recommendations and steps which should be considered when passing an amended court fee regulation based on this proposal across the three level of federal courts.JEL Classification J33; K00; K41 ÂReferences
Alejandro Esteller-Moré & Eres-GarcÃa, M. (2002). A Note on consistent players' valuation. Journal of Sports Economics. - Vol. 3.2002, 4, p. 354-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/152700202237500
Alula, P. & Getachew, A. (2008). Ethiopia at a Justice Crossroads: The Challenge of Customary Dispute Resolution. Document in draft, Centre Français des Etudes Ethio piennes. Addis Ababa.
African Development Bank. (2018). African economic outlook. Retrieved from https:// www.icafrica.org/fileadmin/documents/Knowledge/GENERALINFRA/AfricanEconomicOutlook2018.pdf.
Dari-Mattiacci, G., & Saraceno, M. (2020). Fee shifting and accuracy in adjudication. International Review of Law and Economics, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105890.
De Mot, J., & Miceli, T. J. (2019). The optimal adjustment to liability when litigation is costly: A note. International Review of Law and Economics, 58, 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2019.03.008
FSC. (2020). The Federal Supreme Court of Ethiopia: Unpublished Annual Report, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Federal Courts of Ethiopia. (2020). Court fee (in birr) collected from the three levels of federal courts (2010 to 2019). Unpublished annual report
Gabuthy, Y., Peterle, E., & Tisserand, J. C. (2021). Legal fees, cost-shifting rules and litigation: experimental evidence. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 93, 101705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101705
Gudina G. K, Destaw A., & Rajan, K. (2018). The effect of devaluation on domestic prices in Ethiopia. American Journal of Economics 2018, 8(4), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.economics.20180804.0.
He, X. (2011). Court finance and court reactions to judicial reforms: A tale of two Chinese courts. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1447223
Kayuni, S. (2015). Court fees and access to justice: towards a policy-oriented approach in Malawi. Journal Commonwealth Law 41(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2015.1006239
Kassay, G. (2018). Allocation of costs and fees of civil litigation in Federal Supreme Court cassation division: ‘Does one approach really fit all’? Oromia Law Journal, 7(1). Retrieved from https://www.ajol.info/index.php/olj/article/view/177002
Lupo, G. & Bailey, J. (2014). Designing and implementing e-justice systems: Some lessons learned from EU and Canadian. Laws 3(2), 353-387. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws3020353.
Massenot, B., Maraki, M., & Thöni, C. (2021). Litigation spending and care under the English and American rules: Experimental evidence. American Law and Economics Review, 23(1), 164–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahab005
Maxeiner, J. (2010). Cost and fee allocation in civil procedure, 58 Am. J. Comp. L. 195. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac/768/
Mery. N. R. (2015). Court fees: Charging the user as a way to mitigate judicial congestion," The Latin American and Iberian. Journal of Law and Economics: Vol. 1: Iss. 1, Article 7. Retrieved from http://laijle.alacde.org/journal/vol1/iss1/7.
Qin, J., Yang, X., He, Q., & Sun, L. (2021). Litigation risk and cost of capital: Evidence from China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2020.101393
Tahura, U. S. (2021a). Role of clients, lawyers, judges, and institutions in hiking litigation costs in Bangladesh: An empirical study. Asian Journal of Law and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/als.2020.26
Tahura, U. S. (2021b). Can technology be a potential solution for a cost-effective litigation system in Bangladesh? Justice System Journal, 42(2), 180–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261X.2021.1902437
World Bank. (2010a). Uses and Users of Justice in Africa: The Case of Ethiopia’s Federal Courts. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2937
World Bank. (2010b). Ethiopia: Public Finance Review. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/12301
World Bank. (2019). Ethiopia’s Steady Economic Growth Leads to Poverty Reduction. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/ethiopia/publication/ethiopias-steady-economic-growth-leads-to-poverty-reduction
World Bank. (2020). Ethiopia Socioeconomic Dashboard. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/data/interactive/2020/06/24/ethiopia-socioeconomic-dashboards
