Perjanjian Jaminan Fidusia: Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Yang Dinyatakan Pailit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i3.5578Keywords:
Debt and Receivable Agreement, Fiduciary Agreement, Bankruptcy, Legal ProtectionAbstract
Legal relationships in social life give rise to rights and obligations, one of which is a fiduciary guarantee agreement. The existence of collateral or collateral in the case of granting credit is considered an important part. The existence of a guarantee is an effort to reduce the greater risk of providing credit. Fiduciary guarantees are given by debtors to creditors to repay their debts by transferring ownership rights to objects whose registration of ownership rights is still under the authority of the owner of the object. Meanwhile, the creditor will provide credit financing to the collateral provider. Problems will arise if in its application the creditor financing institution is declared bankrupt. A debtor needs to pay attention to whether the financing institution is facing legal problems, such as being threatened with bankruptcy. What is meant by a state of bankruptcy is that a financing institution is a creditor in a debt and receivable agreement but is a debtor in another agreement. If at any time the creditor becomes bankrupt, then all of the creditor's assets will be included in the bankruptcy case. In fact, there are still many cases involving accountability for the guarantees given, and the return process experiences delays, one of which is the PT case. Arjuna Finance which was declared bankrupt, whose customers felt difficulties because they had not received the objects which at that time were used as collateral. The method used in this research is normative juridical which is based on statutory regulations, legal theory, and expert opinion. The results of this research show that there is legal protection for debtors if the creditor is declared bankrupt in a fiduciary agreement as well as the legal consequences if the creditor is declared bankrupt.References
Buku
Fuady M, (2001) Hukum Kontrak (Dari Sudut Pandang Hukum Bisnis, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti
Fuady M, (2003) Jaminan Fidusia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Fuady M, (2014). Konsep Hukum Perdata. Bandung : Citra Aditya Bakti
Ginting, E. R. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan: Teori Kepailitan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hartono, Hadisaputro, (1984) Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perikatan dan Hukum Jaminan, Yogyakarta:Liberty
Hasbullah Husni Frieda, (2005) Hukum Kebendaan Perdata, Hak-Hak Yang Memberikan Jaminan (jilid 2), Jakarta:Indo Hill-Co.
Agus Yudha Hernoko, (2010) Hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontak Komersial. Jakarta : Kencana Prenada Media Group.
H.S Salim, (2004) Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan Di Indonesia. Mataram: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Marzuki. M.P, (2007). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta. Kencana Penanda Media Group.
Meliala, D. S. (2015). Perkembangan Hukum Perdata Tentang Benda dan Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Nuansa Aulia.
Miru Ahmadi, (2020) Hukum Kontrak & Perancangan Kontrak, Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
M.R. Siombo, (2019). Lembaga pembiayaan dalam perspektif hukum. Jakarta: Unika Atma Jaya
Rahardjo, S. (2021). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Satrio J, (2002) Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti.
Sunaryo, (2009). Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Supramono Gatot, (2013). Perjanjian Utang Piutang, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Witanto, D. Y. (2019). Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen (Aspek Perikatan, Pendaftaran, dan Eksekusi). Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Widjaja Gunawan, Kartini Muljadi (2006) Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 168 Tahun 1999, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3889).
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 131 Tahun 2004, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4443).
Artikel Jurnal (DOI)
Fitriadi, K. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Debitur Dalam Keadaan Kepailitan Pada Perikatan Utang Piutang. Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah, 1(11), 2807-2812 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53625/jcijurnalcakrawalailmiah.v1i11.2865
Hedistira, D. (2020). Kepemilikan Dan Penguasaan Objek Jaminan Fidusia Apabila Terjadi Sengketa Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kredit. Jurnal Privat Law, 8(1), 78-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/privat.v8i1.40372
Istiawati, S. (2021). Kedudukan Perjanjian dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata dalam Sengketa Konsumen. Juripol (Jurnal Institusi Politeknik Ganesha Medan), 4(1), 208-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33395/juripol.v4i1.11034
Nasir, M., Khoiriyah, E., Pamungkas, B. P., Hardianti, I., & Zildjianda, R. (2023). Kedudukan Hukum dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5 (1),241-254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2084
Natalia, T. S. (2018). Akibat Hukum Kepailitan Terhadap Kreditor Pemegang Hak Tanggungan dalam Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 16(3), 153-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29259/jmbs.v16i3.7378
Posumah, R. F. K., Tulung, J. E., & Wangke, S. J. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Rasio Permodalan, Kualitas Piutang, Likuiditas dan Rasio Gearing Terhadap Profitabilitas pada Perusahaan Pembiayaan Periode 2017-2020. Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 10 (3), 1016-1026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v10i3.43498
Rustan, Sahban, Andi Risma, (2021) Perlindungan Hukum Pembelian Kendaraan Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen dan Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia. Supremasi: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Hukum, & Pengajarannya, 16 (1), 10-24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/supremasi.v16i1.20226
Rachmat, R., & Suherman, S. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kreditor Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia Terhadap Harta Debitor Yang Dinyatakan Pailit. Jurnal Hukum Adil, 11 (1), 87-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v11i1.1446
Susilowati, E., & Suharto, R., Intan Cahya W (2016). Akibat Hukum Bagi Kreditor Separatis Pemegang Hak Jaminan Fidusia pada Kepailitan Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Kasus: Putusan Ma No. 4/Pk/Pdt. sus-pailit/2014). Diponegoro Law Journal, 5 (2), 1-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2016.11194
Lain-Lain
Wawancara dengan Immanuel Tobing, pengacara Siregar Setiawan Manalu Law Firm, 12 Desember 2023
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
.png)
Attribution: you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
Legal Spirit allows readers to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to its articles' full texts and allows readers to use them for any other lawful purpose. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions. Finally, the journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
- Authors are allowed to archive their submitted article in an open access repository
- Authors are allowed to archive the final published article in an open access repository with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal
========================================
Editor-in-Chief
Legal Spirit Journal.
Postgraduate Master of Law, Universitas Widya Gama, Malang, Indonesia.
