Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Rapat Umum

Authors

  • Tiara Rizky Aprillia
  • Wiwin Yulianingsih

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i3.5636

Keywords:

Judge’s Consideration, Dissolution, General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS).

Abstract

A limited liability company may only be dissolved at the GMS (General Meeting of Shareholders). In the event that the GMS does not receive authorization, the limited liability company's dissolution will be considered illegal. What are the legal ramifications of dissolving a Limited Liability Company (LLC) without calling a GMS (General Meeting of Shareholders) and what is the foundation for the judge's deliberation in resolving case number 52/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Jbg is the problem statement in this thesis. Article 142 of Law Number 40 of 2007 about Limited Liability Companies and Article 1365 of the Civil Code concerning Unlawful Actions contain regulations pertaining to the dissolution of a limited liability corporation that do not need a general meeting of shareholders. The legal consequences of dissolving a Limited Liability Company without a GMS (General Meeting of Shareholders) are an act against the law because the dissolution must be carried out through a decision of the GMS (General Meeting of Shareholders), rendering the actions of the directors who carry out the unilateral dissolution of PT Anyar Motor without a GMS (General Meeting of Shareholders) invalid. Based on the discussion, it was concluded that the legal consideration of the panel of judges in the Jombang District Court Decision Number 52/Pdt.G/2023/PN.Jbg was that the Defendant's action in dissolving PT Anyar Motor without going through a GMS was an unlawful act which resulted in losses to the Plaintiff.

References

Buku

Abdulkadir, M. (1993). Pengantar Hukum Perusahaan Indonesia, Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Amanat, A. (1997). Pembahasan Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas 1995 dan Penerapannya Dalam Akta Notaris, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Ali, Z. (2015). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Budiarto, A. (2002). Kedudukan Hukum dan Tanggung Jawab Pendiri Perseroan Terbatas. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Garner, B. A. (2014). Black's law dictionary, Tenth Edition, Thomas Reuters.

Ginting, Jamin. (2007). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas (Undang-undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007), Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Harahap, Y. (2021). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika (Bumi Aksara).

Harahap, Y. (2021). Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta: PT. Sinar Grafika (Bumi Aksara).

Khairandy, R., & Terbatas, P. (2009). Doktrin, Peraturan Perundang-Undangan, dan Yurisprudensi, Yogyakarta: Total Media.

Mahmud Marzuki, P. (2005). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media, 55.

Artikel Jurnal

Fauzan, M. I., Ikhwansyah, I., & Lubis, N. A. (2020). Keabsahan Berita Acara Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Yang Dibuat Oleh Notaris Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pewarisan Saham Perseroan Terbatas, ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 3(2), 305-320.

Nasution, B. J. (2014). Sejarah Perkembangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia, INOVATIF| Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7(3).

Paula, P. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Perseroan Terbatas Dalam Likuidasi, ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 4(2), 132-349.

Paramadani, S. (2023). Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Sesuai Ketentuan Hukum Indonesia dan Malaysia, Realism: Law Review, 1(1), 37-57.

Sihotang, R. T. (2023). Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas Berdasarkan Keputusan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham, Jurnal Darma Agung, 31(3), 500-510.

Yuwono, M. Y. (2015). Perkembangan Kewenangan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia. Notarius, 8(2), 207-235.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2024-11-28

How to Cite

Aprillia, T. R., & Yulianingsih, W. (2024). Pembubaran Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Melalui Rapat Umum. Legal Spirit, 8(3), 737–746. https://doi.org/10.31328/ls.v8i3.5636